MPs scrutinising the Government’s latest immigration proposals have used Residential Landlords Association (RLA) background briefings to challenge the immigration minister over Right to Rent.
At last week’s meeting of the Immigration Bill committee, opposition MPs continually referenced the RLA’s document, outlining landlords’ misgivings over right to rent checks. They outlined their concerns about discrimination, the criminalisation of landlords and the retrospective nature of the changes to immigration minister James Brokenshire MP.
RLA policy director David Smith wrote to all committee members calling on them to support an amendment that would give some protection from prosecution for renting to a person without a Right to Rent.
The bill, as currently drafted, would mean that as soon as a landlord receives a notice from the secretary of state that a tenant does not have a Right to Rent they would automatically be committing a criminal offence. This is despite the bill requiring landlords to give such tenants 28 days’ notice to leave the property under the proposed eviction procedure.
The RLA also highlighted concerns over a Government amendment that could see all tenancies covered by Right to Rent checks, rather than only new tenancies agreed after 1 February.
“As previously noted in correspondence to members of the committee the RLA has serious concerns about the potential chaos and confusion of all tenants potentially having their immigration status checked at the same time,” said Smith, “We therefore believe that a phased approach whereby tenants are checked as and when tenancies are up for renewal or created in the first place would be a much better approach.”
Want to comment on this story? If so...if any post is considered to victimise, harass, degrade or intimidate an individual or group of individuals on any basis, then the post may be deleted and the individual immediately banned from posting in future.