By using this website, you agree to our use of cookies to enhance your experience.


Government responds to petition demanding tax changes for landlords

The government has responded to a petition calling on the reintroduction of full mortgage interest relief and the scrapping of the 3% stamp duty surcharge which is having an adverse impact on the private rented sector.

The buy-to-let petition, which has attracted more than 14,000 signatures, makes reference to the alarming decline in the number of residential properties to rent, as a result of the tax changes, as more landlords exit the sector. 

At 100,000 signatures, this petition will be considered for debate in Parliament.


The government has issued a response to the petition, insisting that higher taxes for landlords is helping to “level the playing field” between homeowners and property investors.

But somewhat surprisingly, the Treasury seems to believe that the growing supply-demand imbalance in the rental market, owed mainly to less investment from landlords in the sector, is not “expected to impact rent levels”.

The Treasury response continues: “The government introduced changes to finance cost relief as part of a package of measures at Summer Budget 2015 to help reduce the deficit and rebalance the economy. By restricting landlord’s finance cost relief to the basic rate of income tax we are helping to reduce the advantage landlords may have over homeowners in the property market. Income tax relief for finance costs is not available to ordinary homebuyers. It is also not available to those investing in other assets, such as shares, so we’re helping to reduce the distortion between property investment and investment in other assets.

“Previously, landlords could get relief on their finance costs at their marginal rate of income tax. By restricting finance cost relief to the basic rate, all individual landlords will receive the same rate of income tax relief on their finance costs.

“Landlords can still claim income tax relief at their marginal rate of tax on day-to-day running costs incurred in letting out a property, such as letting agent fees and replacing furniture. Finance costs are different to other expenses as having a mortgage allows the landlord to purchase a more expensive property and incur larger gains on the investment than they would have done without it.

“Using actual self-assessment data, HMRC estimate that only 1 in 5 landlords will pay more tax on their property income because of this measure. We appreciate that some of these landlords may face difficult decisions. This is why the government has chosen to act in a proportionate and gradual way. Basic rate income tax relief will still be available on all landlord's finance costs, and the government announced this change almost two years before its implementation. The restriction, introduced in April 2017, is being phased in over 4 years. This gives landlords time to adjust to the changes.

“Given that only a small proportion of the housing market is affected by this change, the government does not expect it to have a large impact on either house prices or rent levels. The Office for Budget Responsibility (OBR) also expect the impact on the housing market will be small.

“In April 2016, the government introduced higher rates of Stamp Duty Land Tax (SDLT) for those purchasing additional properties. While it is right that people should be free to purchase a second home or invest in a buy-to-let property, the government is aware that this can impact on other people’s ability to get on to the property ladder. The higher rates are part of the government’s commitment to support first time buyers. Since the higher rates have been introduced, over 500,000 people have bought their first home, and first-time buyers make up an increased share of the mortgaged property market.

“At Autumn Budget 2017, the government announced further changes to permanently increase the price at which a property becomes liable to SDLT to £300,000 for first time buyers, with first-time buyers purchasing homes worth between £300,000 and £500,000 saving £5,000. This relief means that 80% of first-time buyers will not pay SDLT, and 95% of first time buyers who pay SDLT will benefit from the change. Since its introduction, 69,000 people have benefited from the relief. Over the next five years, this relief will help over a million first time buyers getting onto the housing ladder.

“The government has also taken wider action on housing to help renters get a fair deal and to address homelessness and rough sleeping. At Autumn Budget 2017, the government committed to £2bn of extra funding for affordable housing, including for social rented homes, bringing total investment in the Affordable Homes Programme to more than £9bn. The government has also allocated over £1.2bn by 2019/20 to help reduce and prevent homelessness and rough sleeping and is implementing the Homelessness Reduction Act, which will ensure that more people get the help they need earlier to prevent them from becoming homeless in the first place. The government aims to halve rough sleeping by 2022 and eliminate it by 2027, and has set up a Rough Sleeping and Homelessness Reduction Taskforce to develop a cross-government strategy to work towards this commitment.”

Want to comment on this story? If so...if any post is considered to victimise, harass, degrade or intimidate an individual or group of individuals on any basis, then the post may be deleted and the individual immediately banned from posting in future.

  • icon

    Load of twaddle

  • G romit

    What did you expect? the Government (Treasury) has just re-iterated the same old sophistry and specious rhetoric it has been dishing out since George Osbourne announced the measure in June 2015.

    They are not going to say "oops we got it wrong" until they have to i.e. when homelessness has gone through the roof due to lack of rental properties, & rents are sky high; and then they'll blame it on Landlords.

  • icon

    The govt has almost killled accidental landlording. The housing market is also at its lowest. The govt must be receiving less revenues from the stamp duty as compared to before the tax changes were introduced

  • icon
    • 30 May 2018 19:52 PM

    Our rental charges are going up now and will continue to do so as we need a means of paying the new section 24 tax. We're also holding off renovations and larger pieces of maintenance. I'm still amazed at how the tenants haven't joined landlords in voicing their condemnation of this taxation bombshell. They're at the sharp end of this. Our tenants do not WANT to buy - are either STUDENTS, or too OLD to get a mortgage, or don't WANT a mortgage, or a here just TEMPORARILY. Tenants are not ALL jumping up and down screaming to get a mortgage. The government's philosophy is predicated on a false assumption.


Please login to comment

MovePal MovePal MovePal
sign up