There are more than 130,000 unlicensed properties in London that should be licensed under either selective, additional or mandatory HMO licensing schemes, new research by London Property Licensing shows.
The study, which was carried out on behalf of safeagent through Freedom of Information (FOI) requests, found there are over 310,000 private rented properties in the capital that require licensing under mandatory HMO, additional and selective licensing schemes implemented under the Housing Act 2004.
Whilst the mandatory HMO licensing applies across England, additional and selective licensing schemes are introduced across London, although this varies depending on which borough it is located in.
But the study shows that non-compliance in London is rife, with licence applications having been submitted for just 25% of the 138,500 private rented properties that require licensing under mandatory HMO or additional licensing schemes.
Without a licence application submitted, these properties are being operated illegally.
Lanldords caught operating an unlicensed property could face prosecution and a fine, or a civil penalty of up to £30,000. The landlord can also be ordered to repay up to 12 months rent.
Somewhat concerningly, many landlords could simply be falling foul of the law through ignorance of the complex regulatory framework.
Since October 2018, the mandatory HMO licensing scheme has applied to most HMOs shared by five or more people whereas it was previously restricted to properties three or more storeys in height.
In some London boroughs, additional licensing schemes have extended licensing to properties rented to just three or four unrelated people.
The research revealed that licence applications have been submitted for 85% of the 173,000 private rented properties that require licensing under selective licensing schemes in London.
Added to the confusion over licensable properties, many London boroughs are struggling to process over 24,000 licence applications - a huge administrative burden that can lead to long delays in issuing licence approvals. Currently, about 40% of boroughs still rely on paper applications.
safeagent is calling for a simple, streamlined licensing process that would make it more cost effective for the public purse, easier for councils to enforce, and clearer for landlords and agents to understand whether a property should be licensed.
Isobel Thomson, safeagent CEO, said: “The results of the survey are concerning. Consumers are not being well served and indeed many are being placed at risk through this mish mash of licensing schemes. Right now, the system isn't fit for purpose and Councils are drowning in paperwork.
“Landlords needing property licences are either deliberately evading the schemes or are in the dark concerning their legal responsibilities and tenants are being placed at risk.
“If the compliance rate for HMO licensing schemes is only 25%, how can these schemes be effective? Ultimately this is about proper use of public money and consumer protection. Where are the assessment procedures for Councils who have schemes in place?
“Isn't it time we went back to the drawing board to come up with a simple, streamlined system that works for all?"
Want to comment on this story? If so...if any post is considered to victimise, harass, degrade or intimidate an individual or group of individuals on any basis, then the post may be deleted and the individual immediately banned from posting in future.