The National Residential Landlords Association says it backs a report by MPs sharply criticising EPCs and urging more effective modern energy efficiency measures for homes.
Currently EPCs have to be shown to prospective tenants and each rental property must have a rating of E or above; the government wants to raise the minimum energy efficiency rating from E to C for new tenancies from 2025 and for all existing tenancies from 2028.
However, now the all-party Environmental Audit Committee, under the leadership of Conservative Philip Dunne, says EPCs are outdated and do not support modern energy efficiency and low carbon heating measures.
Instead EPCs should be replaced by Building Renovation Passports “developed with an approved, standardised methodology.”
The MPs say the government appears to have underestimated the costs to decarbonise UK homes by 2050, at between £35 billion and £65 billion.
Some 19 million UK properties need energy efficiency upgrades to meet EPC band C, and the committee has heard in evidence that it can cost on average £18,000 per home - far greater than the government’s estimate.
NRLA local authority policy officer Gavin Dick says: “We welcome the report, which features a range of recommendations that the NRLA have been calling for, which we believe would ensure landlords are empowered to make these essential changes.
“We know that landlords are willing to do the work, but they require more information on what updates to make and the order in which to do this work to make their properties energy efficient.
“The committee recommendation also supports the NRLA’s calls to Government to roll over funds for the Green Homes Grants scheme. We’re also very supportive of the Committee’s call for the introduction of Building Renovation Passports to aid in the decarbonisation of homes.
“In our view the Committee’s recommendations would give landlords confidence to carry out the work to ensure the PRS plays its role in helping to bring about a net zero Britain by 2050.”
In addition to replacing EPCs with Building Renovation Passports, the MPs' committee recommends:
- The government should set out how energy efficiency improvements can be reached in homes currently out of scope in its "cost effective, practical and affordable" criteria;
- Schemes such as the Home Upgrade Grants, Social Housing Decarbonisation Fund and phase two of the Green Homes Grant Local Authority Delivery Scheme should all have their funding front-loaded and the schemes rolled out without delay;
- All allocated funding for the Green Homes Grant that has not been spent by the end of March 2021 should be rolled over;
- The social rented sector should be subject to the same standards as the private rented sector;
- Government should set out an ambitious but realistic trajectory for owner occupiers to achieve minimum EPC C standards in its Heat and Buildings Strategy;
- The Chancellor should reconsider proposals to reduce to five per cent the rate of VAT on the labour element of refurbishment and renovations, and reinstate the reduced rate of VAT payable on Energy Saving Materials at five per cent while expanding its scope to cover energy storage, heat pumps and electric vehicle charging. Up until 2019, certain clean technologies were eligible for a reduced rate of VAT of five per cent;
- Government should work with the financial sector and major landlords, including local authorities and other social landlords, to stimulate renovation through green mortgages, green finance and low-cost loans;
- The government should consider how the national infrastructure bank could be used as a vehicle to finance energy efficiency given the scale of success achieved in Germany through its state funded low interest loan scheme;
- The government's basic energy advice service available in England should be upgraded to a specialist bespoke advice service similar to the Home Energy Scotland network.
Want to comment on this story? Our focus is on providing a platform for you to share your insights and views and we welcome contributions.
If any post is considered to victimise, harass, degrade or intimidate an individual or group of individuals, then the post may be deleted and the individual immediately banned from posting in future.
Please help us by reporting comments you consider to be unduly offensive so we can review and take action if necessary. Thank you.
.jpg)
%20(002).png)
.png)
Join the conversation
Jump to latest comment and add your reply
£18 k per property will = a big increase in rent.
Yup - I will be looking to get all that money back from tenants within 5 years above normal rent prices.
I am not paying for ANY refurbisments that I do not think are necessary.
If the Govt. wants it they must pay for it.
If not, then they will be increasing tenat rentals. Poor them. Perhaps the tenant should lobby the Govt. to stop it.
The government has the target to reduce emissions. The occupiers and landlords/owners will go along with the morality of it, but do not want to pay for it. The occupier would gain financially due to lower utility bills.
Could the occupier pay the same utility costs, but have a rebate of 20% of the utility bill saving. The other 80% saving would go to the government to pay for the improvements. This would continue until the cost of the improvement was completely paid for.
Subsequently the occupier would pay the lower utility bills (ie with 100% of the savings).
The government could use the EPC data to establish the properties where the highest energy or Carbon emissions savings could be created for the lowest cost. Then have local companies perform the improvements.
Overall this has the greatest positive impact on the climate change issue for the lowest cost to the government.
The occupier receives some of the savings and eventually receives all of the savings. The landlords/owners are financially neutral.
The property quality is improved for the whole of the UK, starting with the properties that urgently need the improvements and have the biggest positive impact on the climate change issue.
Please login to comment