x
By using this website, you agree to our use of cookies to enhance your experience.
Graham Awards

TODAY'S OTHER NEWS

Criminal conviction for landlord with six unlicensed properties

A landlord who did not hold licences for her six properties, has ended up with a criminal conviction and a hefty fine. 

Landlord Susannah Meisner, sole director of both London Land Holdings Ltd and London Land Holdings 1 Ltd, were the subject of a case heard at Reading Magistrates’ Court.

Slough council had made many attempts to engage the landlords regarding selective licences and repairs at the properties in Chalvey, but they didn’t respond.

Advertisement

The charges brought were under Section 95(1) of the Housing Act 2004, operating a property required to be licensed without a licence and failure to comply with a Statutory Nuisance Abatement Notice in breach of Section 80(4) of the Environmental Protection Act 1990. This was in relation to broken toilets in one property. 

Meisner attended court and gave evidence. She stated the companies were set up in order to buy the properties and she had handed over control and responsibility to her husband. She denied having any involvement with the running of the companies at all. 

The following day, her husband Joel Fried gave evidence. He spoke about how he delegated everything to do with the property to another person and was under the impression the licensing was done. He confirmed another management company was now dealing with the properties. 

The Magistrates returned after an hour of consideration and convicted the defendants on all offences. Full costs were awarded. 

London Land Holdings was sentenced to a fine of £3,236 and costs of £1,553; London Land Holdings 1 was sentenced to a fine of £5,393.75 and costs of £1,553, plus a surcharge of £108; and Susannah Meisner herself was sentenced to a fine of £4,228 and costs of £1,553. 

The total in fines, costs and surcharges is £17,624.75. 

A Slough council spokesperson says: “This case shows the importance of being a responsible landlord. You can’t just ignore your legal responsibilities to your tenants or ignore repeated contact from the council. 

“We hope other landlords learn a lesson, will be responsive to issues reported and will ensure they have all the necessary licences to operate, for the protection of themselves and their tenants.”

The council finally received licence applications from newly appointed managing agents last month.

Want to comment on this story? Our focus is on providing a platform for you to share your insights and views and we welcome contributions.
If any post is considered to victimise, harass, degrade or intimidate an individual or group of individuals, then the post may be deleted and the individual immediately banned from posting in future.
Please help us by reporting comments you consider to be unduly offensive so we can review and take action if necessary. Thank you.

  • PossessionFriendUK PossessionFriend

    If there's serious fault in contravention of Building - HHSRS Regs, then the person responsible should be dealt with for those, substantive matters.

    Is it the Councils case that there were significant breaches of standards at these properties, and yet the charge - is one of not having paid a fee for a piece of paper entitling the landlord to rent the properties.

    icon

    Proper paperwork is the top priority for Council bureaucrats. It's the only thing that they understand or value.

     
icon

Please login to comment

MovePal MovePal MovePal
sign up