x
By using this website, you agree to our use of cookies to enhance your experience.
Graham Awards

TODAY'S OTHER NEWS

More Lenders Cut Rates and Rules to Win Landlord Clients

Three more lenders have revised their buy to let mortgage range as competition continues apace to get landlord customers.

Landbay has announced rate reductions across most of its two- and five-year fixed rate products, with cuts of up to 0.10%.

The 10-basis point reduction applies to the entire two-year fixed range, excluding large houses in multiple occupation (HMOs)/multi-unit blocks (MUFBs) and tracker products. Rates now start at 4.24% at 75% loan-to-value (LTV) with a 6% fee.

Advertisement

The five-year fixed rate range also sees a 10-basis point cut, with rates starting at 4.74% at 75% LTV with a 7% fee. Zero-fee products are available. The exceptions in this range are large HMOs/MUFBs and two standard five-year fixed options — one with a £1,299 fee and another with a 2% fee — both reduced by 0.5%.

Meanwhile Suffolk Building Society has announced rate cuts on its expat holiday let and expat buy to let products.

The mutual is reducing rates by up to 30 bps, and extending the end dates of the deals.

The changes are on 80% LTV expat holiday let two-year fixed cut by 30 bps to 6.09% (previously 6.39%) now extended until October 31 2026; and 80% LTV expat buy to let two-year fixed reduced by 10bps to 5.99% (previously 6.09%) also extended until October 31 2026; and finally 80% LTV expat buy to let two-year fixed (3% completion fee) at 5.29%, again extended until October 31 2026.

Finally Metro Bank has enhanced the criteria on its interest only and BTL mortgages.

As part of the changes, interest only mortgages will have access to a higher loan-to-value at 80%.

For BTL customers, affordability stress rates will be at the product interest rate when a five-year fixed rate is selected or for remortgage applications where there is no additional capital raising required. The number of properties a customer can mortgage with the lender has also been increased up to 10 or up to a maximum aggregate mortgage debt of £10m, alongside updates to its income coverage ratios.

Want to comment on this story? Our focus is on providing a platform for you to share your insights and views and we welcome contributions.
If any post is considered to victimise, harass, degrade or intimidate an individual or group of individuals, then the post may be deleted and the individual immediately banned from posting in future.
Please help us by reporting comments you consider to be unduly offensive so we can review and take action if necessary. Thank you.

  • icon

    Rate cuts are always welcome, but so is getting your property back when you want it back or need it back. Lots more work required to get landlords optimistic again. Voting REFORM would be a good start!

    icon

    I'll be voting Reform. 👍

     
  • icon

    Too late for me... Never again! I wouldn't take on another buy to let even at 0%.

  • icon

    Those products with 7% fees sound attractive-NOT

  • icon
    • A S
    • 19 June 2024 09:50 AM

    The numbers just don't stack up for BTL anymore, at least not in the South. Prices for property at auctions have gone through the roof, no bargains to be had. Yields are around 3-5%, if you're lucky. Just one boiler that blows up or a roof that leaks and that's all your margin gone. Add in the ever-growing admin (what is our time worth?), the stress and the political direction of travel hammering us even more and it's a perfect storm.

    The only 1 potential benefit is capital appreciation. But then you consider the director of travel for CGT.....

    There are far better ways of earning a crust. The powers that be obviously know that, so the only logical conclusion is that this is all being done by design. The losers are the tenants (present and future ones), which probably include our own children and grandchildren. It's a shame.

    icon

    AS - Your analysis is spot on. PRS appear to be driven out the market. Only the Corporates will remain who will then be able to dictate rents, terms and selection of tenants. This is exactly what happened with the private care homes.

     
  • icon

    6% fee yes right give 6% of your equity away on day one, feels me with optimism that does 😂

  • icon

    Lenders do not lower rates without putting up, up-front arrangement fees. So for me paying fees like 5, 6,7% in fees is just astronomical. I would rather pay no fees or up to 2%. We get relief on interest and not on the fees. There are other maintenance issues, which needs to be considered. It is not worth being landlord anymore. Tenants, like the landlords have to decide, who they need to vote for. Angela Rayner's hometown are not happy about her and the hometown. Labour councils are going downhill and will continue to do so. So votes count.
    I would never borrow 75% anymore. Not interested in buying anymore properties. Just sell and reduce the mortgages and elsewhere.

  • icon

    Whenever I have looked at getting a mortgage the ones with the fees work out more expensive over the 2y or 5y term, so I only look at the no fees options.

    icon

    Agree I always go for the no fees option these days.

     
icon

Please login to comment

MovePal MovePal MovePal
sign up