x
By using this website, you agree to our
use of cookies
to enhance your experience.
SEARCH
Search
STAY
CONNECTED!
Sign in
Sign in
New here? Sign up
Feedback
My Account
Feedback
Sign out
×
Make Today's Website as home page
Menu
Estate agent today
News
Features
Guides & Tips
NEW
Trade Directory
Archive
Advertise with us
Letting agent today
News
Features
Guides & Tips
NEW
Trade Directory
Archive
Advertise with us
Landlord today
News
Features
Guides & Tips
NEW
Trade Directory
Archive
Advertise with us
Property Investor today
News
Guides & Tips
NEW
Trade Directory
Archive
Advertise with us
Introducer today
News
Guides & Tips
NEW
Trade Directory
Archive
Advertise with us
Property Jobs Today
Home
Find a Job
Search Recruiters
Recruiters
New
A's
Personal Profile
View my company profile
A Bhalla
2492
Profile Views
About Me
Send message
View company profile
Follow all comments made
my expertise in the industry
A's wall
A's
Recent Activity
Spot on @Ellie Edwards! I second that. The NRLA team and it’s leaders don’t seem to be vocal to raise PRS landlords points of views, it’s negative impact on tenants or anything about it in the media or in Parliament to fight RRB strongly & repeatedly. Best wishes.
From:
A Bhalla
21 September 2023 08:16 AM
It can only mean one thing - General elections are round the corner. Rishi, Starmer et all politicians are coming up with weird & wacky unrealistic manifesto plans to eradicate homelessness, help charities, attack PRS landlords, build more houses whilst both the Conservatives & Labour are stealthily promising to sell off UK by stealth agreements to be ruled by EU & take their illegals to continue the demand for more housing in our small island. RRB needs to be scrapped alongside any agreements with EU based rulers to take their illegals aka refugees, many of whom intentionally made themselves homeless by not applying for refugee status in the first safe country. People’s votes 🗳️ need to be for Britain First instead of Cons, Liebour, or LiarLibDems to stop illegals, EU and UN ruling over U.K.’s self governing Democracy. Best wishes to all Legal, Good PRS Landlords and Tenants.
From:
A Bhalla
21 September 2023 08:12 AM
True. Brent council team members appear frequently on Nightmare Tenants, Scum Landlords. They definitely seem to appear as scammers with one goal - support unscrupulous tenants to take over the landlord’s property. Over 100 PRS landlords in my network have sold up their properties recently in Brent-Labour controlled scammer council, resulting in an increased homelessness. Best wishes to All Good Landlords.
From:
A Bhalla
27 July 2023 09:00 AM
Unbelievable! NRLA’s professional standards are slipping-more in favour of anti landlord policies and laws instead of supporting PRS landlords. Best wishes to all good landlords.
From:
A Bhalla
25 July 2023 08:40 AM
Strictly No Pets in my properties. Tenants are informed and have to sign in contracts agreeing No pets, or eviction notice will be given. All Pets/their hair/smells etc can trigger life threatening allergies hence it’s a definitely No on medical grounds. Fish in a clean aquarium is the only pet, which doesn’t trigger allergic reactions for me, hence that’s allowed, absolutely no dogs/cats/hamsters/snakes/turtles/similar in my properties. I don’t even visit my family and friends homes who have pesky pets. Human’s safety is above pets/animals. I provide a home for Humans, not animals. End of.
From:
A Bhalla
25 July 2023 08:33 AM
Spot on! Long term tactics are to allow Corporates plus Council’s to buy the land and properties at lower prices. Properties for sale market is currently flooded with small landlords, HMO owners looking to offload them = opportunities for Council’s & corporates. Best wishes to all good, honest, hardworking small landlords.
From:
A Bhalla
18 July 2023 09:35 AM
Spot on! But then who in their right mind will give these lazy, destructive criminals, inconsiderate, dirty, filthy, foul mouth, badly behaved, shi* like smelling extinction rebellion people a job🤔 I wouldn’t hire them even to clean the toilets 🚽 in my house, rented homes, empty homes or in commercial corporations buildings. The govt needs to empower police to arrest, give criminal records and name and shame extinction rebellion protesters to warn their potential employers and general public not to trade or even interact with them. Extinction rebellion are akin to a terrorist group disrupting civilians peaceful life, destroying others property hence should be declared a terrorist group and banned in the U.K..
From:
A Bhalla
07 July 2023 09:26 AM
Laws are not fit for purpose either, unfairly supporting rogue tenants whilst destroying good PRS LL’s. Courts just follow the laws of the land.
From:
A Bhalla
20 June 2023 23:33 PM
There is no incentive or enforcement to make tenants behave when laws are in favour of rogue tenants who don’t pay, trash the LL’s property and still can not be evicted without long periods of stress and high costs for PRS LL, whereas a council has the powers to evict tenants. And council also has the powers to enter PRS LL’s property in the homeowners absence to find faults-especially when a tenant is facing a PRS LL’s eviction, threaten to fix anything and blame, recharge LL’s, but worst of all, ask judges to transfer the ownership to council!. PRS homes are much better quality and energy efficient than council ones not just from EPC but overall perspective. If the laws became fair and tenants knew that they can be evicted within six weeks, as well as landlords being penalised for unsafe properties, both sides will behave. Instead of only LL’s having to comply with EPC, face low rental income, pay high taxes, face mortgage arrears and bad credit history due to tenants non payments and a convoluted eviction process, PRS tenants should be legally held responsible for fixing mould due to their lifestyle, undertake minor maintenance for daily usage wear and tear by humans and pets, maintenance of gardens, driveways, indoors, outdoors structures used by the tenant and paying for regular rental increases in agreement plus vacate the property at an agreed time/day leaving it in good condition. Best wishes to good PRS LL’s and good tenants.
From:
A Bhalla
19 June 2023 08:10 AM
Spot on! 👍
From:
A Bhalla
01 June 2023 18:40 PM
Spot on Ellie Edwards! I concur. It’s time for updating U.K. Parliamentary & Political party leadership ethics committee laws. It should be mandatory for Khan as a Mayor and Starmer as the political party leader to provide rooms in their own, family, cousins, uncles, aunts, grandparents, charities, investment/business associates multiple owned houses under disguised methods for free-especially for illegals, renters for lifetime, and their next generations lifetime. These laws should be mandatory and enforced rigorously U.K. wide to release the political leaders housing stock and for some fairness towards the hardworking current & future generations of British people who work hard to buy houses & provide good quality safe housing to tenants as PRS Landlords. Or we can always dream that London voters will become sensible to vote 🗳️ Khan and his party out in the next elections to get Britain First or similar who actually put British people first. Conservatives, Lib Dem’s, Greens et All are just as anti British PRS landlords as Labour unfortunately Britain First is possibly the only hope for British taxpayers & future generations to stop U.K. becoming a socialist communist place, wiped out by illegals squatting alongside rogue tenants being protected by police/lawyers/councils in people’s second/multiple homes. U.K.’s destruction is a certainty with Labour’s & all political party leaders except for Britain First, in my & many others opinion. Best wishes to all honest, hard working good landlords.
From:
A Bhalla
24 May 2023 08:14 AM
Must be nearer voting 🗳️ time for landlord politicians to blame the landlords who actually provide safe housing for workers. Salmon farm owners need to pay better wages to workers or build temporary accommodation on farms rather than Blaming PRS landlords. In any case, Wild salmon is a healthier option for than farmed one full of chemicals- source Timecom-21 July 22 therefore best to not increase salmon farming in Scotland 🏴 and let the beautiful green belt survive for Current and Future generations lung health as well as for a healthy planet. Quote: “Seafood Watch, an independent guide to fish consumption affiliated with the Monterey Bay Aquarium, recommends avoiding most farmed Atlantic salmon because of excessive chemical use and disease. Nutritionists generally recommend eating wild salmon over farmed salmon.” Unquote. It’s becoming a case of #savescotlandfromeu and #savePRSLandlords from mindless Scottish politicians. One wonders what happened, whether farmed fish is to be blamed for declining the intelligence of Scottish people in the last decades, voting for leaders intent on destroying history, beautiful Seas and Lands of Scotland 🏴 by campaigning to hand it over to European bureaucrats.
From:
A Bhalla
27 February 2023 08:00 AM
What else could be expected from NCC (and London) with communist policies led Labour leader, (mayor-in London) and Chair of Housing Committee. Next stop - Labour leaders is planning Compulsory Purchase Orders to acquire PRS HMO’s and private rented homes to be used for Social housing if they win the next general elections. PRS is doomed under Labour or Lib Dem’s giving Councils more powers to decimate it & take landlords livelihood away. Conservatives have already empowered councils under the pressure, Labour will simply make it worse. Best to vote in local and general elections for a party which looks after Great Britain’s people’s interests -putting BritainFirst.
From:
A Bhalla
17 February 2023 08:15 AM
Yep 👍 voting 🗳️ time is approaching. Labour destroying PRS, increasing wealth tax, enforcing Socialism by CPO, opening borders to welcome all illegally, no visa needed to enter U.K. by anyone. Conservatives - handing over taxpayers money multi billions and Defence Services equipment to EU for wars, selling U.K. Plc assets, more taxes, and discouraging PRS by BTR policies for giant corporations without ensuring safe builds and making people rent for life from only large businesses, no room for small PRS. Best to vote for the party putting Britain First, the only political party supporting Veterans housing, highlighting illegals invasions, fighting for disabled & children’s rights. Vote for Britain First. Popcorn 🍿 ready for 2024 circus 🎪 during elections 🗳️.
From:
A Bhalla
16 February 2023 07:47 AM
Ellie Edwards, Insightful info! I will be voting the party that has been putting Great Britain first, to stop illegals invasion, and supporting veterans, despite being obstructed by politicians sending police to stop patriotism activities by classifying them as racism. Britain 🇬🇧 First have my vote 🗳️. Here is hoping that Londoners will not vote for the Labour. The Labour mayor has destroyed London in every sense-alongside PRS. Labour wants PRS destroyed, are planning wealth taxes and compulsory purchase orders to take over the assets people worked hard for. Conservatives are selling U.K. Plc to EU, donating billions for wars whilst U.K. veterans/disabled/children & adults alike are suffering homelessness. Only one choice remains at the next election- vote for Britain First.
From:
A Bhalla
16 February 2023 07:32 AM
Yep, more PRS landlords are forced to sell up & reduce their rental portfolio due to unfair laws weighted towards tenants, and govt bureaucracy, unfair judicial systems encouraging, protecting rogue tenants U.K. wide. Not worth taking the stresses of being a landlord when the Govt as well as opposition politicians are intent on getting rid of private small landlords by rent controls whilst increasing landlords costs by additional admins, statutory requirements & removing the facility to immediately evict rogue tenants. Homelessness is going to continue increasing unless laws are made fairer to allow evicting rogue tenants and no rent controls, to encourage more small entrepreneurial landlords in providing safe homes, thereby reducing homelessness by default. Best wishes to Good landlords and good tenants.
From:
A Bhalla
25 November 2022 08:39 AM
It’s about civil matters including s21 cases: Another article on Landlord today states that ‘Landlords are to face even longer wait for eviction court cases following the spending cuts announced in the Autumn Statement, it’s feared. “The justice system is in crisis and facing systemic failure. Increased funding is vital to keep it functioning” says Nick Emmerson, Vice President of the Law Society of England and Wales. He continues: “In criminal justice, there are huge backlogs in the courts. Victims’, witnesses’ and defendants’ lives are in limbo as they wait years for justice, with cases listed as far ahead as 2024.” s21 needs to be retained for fair laws to enable good landlords & help to keep people in safe homes in PRS.
From:
A Bhalla
25 November 2022 08:26 AM
Edwin Morris- Spot on! 👍 Time to find a leader and British political party which will put #Britishpeople, #Britishveterans and #GreatBritainFirst. Conservatives, Labour, LibDems & Greens are certainly not going to put #GreatBritainFirst. SNP leader is a disaster for Scottish people. Wonder if Nigel Farage has plans to collaborate with #BritainFirst-the only political party currently supporting homeless #Britishveterans, and trying to stop illegal immigrants, championing fairness for British people despite problems created by Police & reverse racism. GE time is not too far-catch 22 for public to decide who to vote 🗳️ for - stay in the Conservatives frying pan or jump into Labour/other fire to completely destroy the future generations of U.K. -a big dilemma for landlords and other professionals alike🤔. Best wishes.
From:
A Bhalla
24 November 2022 11:28 AM
Yep 👍, that’s what Sunak’s plan is. No more Conservative votes 🗳. Only a party which puts #greatbritainfirst will get my vote 🗳 at the time of next GE. Certainly not Conservatives if Sunak the sna*e is PM/Chancellor/other role destroying the self employed & future generations of Great Britain. Best wishes to all.
From:
A Bhalla
29 October 2022 23:10 PM
John Young, Yes you can. That’s exactly how Shelter & Gen. Rent/charities operate. PRS LL’s can’t use that model unless they are genuinely operating as a Non Profit charity, not a private commercial business.
From:
A Bhalla
12 October 2022 23:32 PM
That’s why London’s mayor, John Lewis Partnership, Lloyds Bank, many councils etc are building ‘build to rent’ homes so that people will never get an opportunity to ‘own’ a home, but keep paying these companies rent for life. It will be interesting to see how many substantial financial subsidies are/will be provided to these companies owners and tenants by every govt/taxpayers. Time will tell.
From:
A Bhalla
12 October 2022 11:29 AM
It would be great if only all govts had sensible decision makers as yourself Michael Foley. This is a perfectly balanced and fair solution for both LL’s and tenants, straightforward clear laws, courts involvement not required & homelessness reduced thanks to private rental sector landlords. I will vote for you.
From:
A Bhalla
12 October 2022 11:23 AM
I’m not keen on 5-10 years AST, 2 years is the maximum before any unscrupulous tenants/shelter/councils supporting tenants start asserting (using multiple methods/housing acts) a claim on the landlord’s property as being the tenant’s forever home without ever actually having worked hard to save to buy or maintain a rented home to a good standard. s21 is not used as a ‘no blame’ eviction-no landlord wants to evict a good tenant who pays on time, maintains the property and doesn’t use the landlord’s property for anti social or illegal activities by self/visitors. s21 helps to manage evictions in a mature sensible manner without adults blaming the tenant or landlord, a mature sensible process similar to an easy ‘no blame’ divorce related laws recently brought in by the govt. to avoid wasting courts and families time, stress, money for adults who can’t/are unwilling to live happily in their homes. Therefore s21 is a sensible solution and should be kept but the Gods of decision will let people know soon enough. Best wishes to good LL’s and good tenants without pets.
From:
A Bhalla
12 October 2022 11:19 AM
Due to unscrupulous tenants ruining properties with their pets, many good LL’s including myself don’t allow pets. Despite my allergies 🤧, I used used to allow pets until a tenant’s ‘well trained’ pet went crazy, resulting in multiple anti social behaviour warning and threats of legal cases from the neighbors & council to the landlord, ultimately eviction of the tenant and a damaged property costing over £10k in repairs & redecorations. Now it’s a permanent ‘no pets’ ‘humans only’ policy for tenant and landlord’s health and safety reasons. As a good landlord, neighbor, human helping to reduce homelessness- #nopetsinmyhomes is the standard policy. I will legally challenge anyone trying to enforce/ mandate ‘pets must be allowed’ in my properties. My human rights are above any animal rights, my decision who to allow to live, visit, use my properties. My property, bought with my money, my decision whether to allow humans, pets, aliens, anything else in my properties. For pets welfare, their owners and animal rights supporters need to have clear laws for all pet owners, be it for residential, or tenanted properties. #nopetsinrentedaccomodation #nopetsinsharedaccomodation #nopetsinapartmentblocks #nopetsinhomeswithoutgarden #petsonlyallowedinownhomewithgardenforanimalwelfare
From:
A Bhalla
12 October 2022 08:54 AM
This law in Scotland gets my vote for public safety. 👍 It should be a law in every country - no convicted criminal landlords - direct or indirect via SPV/company. Tenants need to be protected from criminal landlords, who are also ruining the life (& reputation) of good, honest PRS landlords. Tenants are at a liberty, and should do criminal background checks on landlords as a standard process for own safety & due diligence. There are costs associated with it - just like everything else in life. I did LL’s criminal background checks as a standard process when renting (U.K., USA, India, Germany) during the university years, thanks to the safety guidance provided by my brother.
From:
A Bhalla
30 August 2022 11:03 AM
Institutional Investors are heading to BTR for lifetime profits at the cost of tenants whilst accusing good PRS Landlords of benefiting from rents-ironic. Shelter, Politicians (from all parties), London’s current mayor, their associates/families/clans, John Lewis, Legal & General, Lloyds, Halifax, Aviva, other banks are all jumping at the chance of BTR lifetime profits from the tenants. It would be interesting to know what actions Shelter would take to evict a rogue tenant for unpaid rents, property damages etc. from Shelter’s BTR portfolio. Time will tell.
From:
A Bhalla
30 August 2022 10:45 AM
No govt is ever good at being everything to everyone - especially during a war type scenario. This govt has done a great job of delivering what people voted for, steering U.K. out of a worldwide pandemic 😷 a germ 🦠 warfare successfully, implementing border controls despite activists supporting illegals and creating favourable worldwide Trade agreements independently without being ruled by EU bureaucrats. PRS LL’s have now got an opportunity to join the Redress scheme and they should apply for it to start influencing policies for fairness towards good PRS LL’s. It’s no use complaining about govts but not putting self forward to lead when an opportunity arises. Taking an active role, continue leading despite setbacks, objections, activists, backstabbers etc. is required to make positive changes for everything in life, including in govts & by PRS LL’s Best wishes to PRS LL’s applying for an Advisory role. They will succeed in being the leading Changemakers to create fair policies to balance laws for supporting landlords.🙏
From:
A Bhalla
13 July 2022 10:57 AM
And yet the Corporates including John Lewis, Lloyds, Legal & General, London Housing schemes (Khan/Labour/Liberal MP’s/their families & associates bring the private investors) and many more are the alternative versions of small fish PRS LL’s. These corporations have OPM to fight off/change planning rules including building in green belt zones, they receive high value subsidies from local councils to central govts (regardless of political party) therefore can build & maintain rental homes at cheap costs due to bulk procure power and spend thousands on tenant evictions if required. PRS LL is not a profitable or low stress business and yet foreign investors have pooled over £90.7bn in U.K. BTL (source PropertyInvestorToday). PRS LL’s need to join the Advisory team referred in the article to try and influence fair policies towards PRS landlords. Best wishes.
From:
A Bhalla
13 July 2022 10:40 AM
The opportunity is there for taking as a LL advisor on the Property Redress Scheme Advisory Panel. Joining the panel will provide a channel to highlight and influence fair policies towards PRS LL’s. Best wishes. Best wishes.
From:
A Bhalla
13 July 2022 10:24 AM
Agreed. 👍 Time for Landlords to step and join the Advisory scheme. This is an excellent opportunity for PRS LL’s (who use letting agents) to represent & influence the policies on behalf of good LL’s. Best wishes.
From:
A Bhalla
13 July 2022 10:20 AM
👍
From:
A Bhalla
10 July 2022 16:27 PM
Contents policy won’t cover anything. Long story short: Pet ran into the toilet 🚽 unit at fast speed-resulted in a tear drop leak spreading into the whole flat damaging carpets+underlay and wooden furniture, apparently the tenant thought that damp carpet patches were due to hot weather & humidity. Contents insurer declined £8k+ damages claim. Tenant left without informing the landlord & resigned from the job, so no chance of recovering damages from the tenant, landlord left licking their financial wounds by tenants/their pet. In my & associates properties - #saynotopets including #comfortpets for HSE reasons - severe allergic reactions to all pets (except Goldfish), can result in a human’s death by allergy hence for human rights #nopetsallowed.
From:
A Bhalla
09 July 2022 09:54 AM
With Boris having been back stabbed by his trusted Sunak, Javid et all-what a quagmire for personal gains from public funds via votes 🗳 by ambitious multi millionaire top 50 rich 🤑 politicians! I voted Conservatives during the last GE & local elections. Boris and Patel were key factors for my, family, and business associates votes for putting Britain’s people first by implementing people’s vote/referendum after May had wasted time & my/taxpayers money in begging from Eucrates. I won’t go as far as voting for Loonies, Libbies, tax avoidance Sunak or back stabbers like Javid, but might be a candidate who actually puts Britain & it’s own people First, might as well be the Britain First political party - even if not the Landlords First - waiting and watching patiently. My motto for next elections votes 🗳 - #voteforbritainfirst
From:
A Bhalla
09 July 2022 09:39 AM
Spot on!
From:
A Bhalla
29 June 2022 09:11 AM
All part of the politics, blaming Right/Left/Other parties ⭕️. London Housing (TFL, Roads, Terrorism etc) & generally this beautiful city has deteriorated since the current mayor was elected by gullible locals. Labour, Lib Dems council’s & Shelter’s caring (sarcasm intended) attitude to keep tenants in social unsafe homes resulted in Grenfell and multiple other disasters with unfortunate losses of human lives. Now Labour Mayors, Lib Dems, Green and some Conservative croonies along side many ‘Lords’ investing in BTR - then will use Rent controls for votes 🗳- all political circus 🎪⭕️. Agile Landlords with sufficient availability of cash flow/credit markets & ideally political influential contacts in the local councils will survive with no probs, others would struggle especially as soon as BTR buildings are fully operational & controlled by the council/govt. I live near a BTR building, currently privately owned in Greater London. Homes are empty since even the cash rich 🤑 young bankers (one of them being my ex tenants) can not afford £2,200 plus bills & service charges rent for 1 bed apartment. Based on the ‘Homeless’ tenants feedback, the council has sent a ‘consultation’ to local area residents/tenants acquire the building under ‘CPO’ to pay what the council thinks the value is = peanuts to the private owner. The building owner is unfortunately having to fight a costly battle in court. Here is hoping that he wins against the council and shelter to make English law at least a little bit fair towards PRS-Commercial landlords. Best wishes to all good PRS landlords & sensible tenants.
From:
A Bhalla
22 June 2022 12:36 PM
👏👏 Lol 😂🤣 Robert Brown. Definition of a woman in my opinion: A child biologically born as a female at the time of birth is defined as a Woman after turning into an adult. Although other genders may portray/think/claim to feel/external visually appear/can have surgery to look like a woman, it doesn’t actually make them a woman in reality. One is born how one is born- within the biological definitions. One has a right to define oneself as one wants afterwards. Hope my perspective helps others.
From:
A Bhalla
10 April 2022 17:11 PM
Chris Lee, I agree. In today’s world of equality, why are they trying to state that ‘women only’ rental website/Digital platform is required in U.K.? This is just another marketing ploy, to influence weak minded women or potentially also attract predator landlords who will want to advertise on platforms meant for only one gender section of society. Spending 30 hours to find a suitable rental property, doing due diligence to find the right property to rent & spending money in moving costs is standard process globally, not a big surprise for anyone-let alone a sensible woman! Smart women need to do own due diligence than fall prey to these types of doubtful rental websites claiming to be for ‘women only’. National Crime Agency may find these useful source though to investigate crimes.
From:
A Bhalla
10 April 2022 16:58 PM
Spot on! 👍 Legal & General, Lloyds bank, London’s Mayor, all anti PRS political parties members, Scottish & Welsh MP’s are invested into the multi billion BTR market. URL’s are not allowed here. Just read up on Legal & General BTR investment of 7,000 homes, Knight Frank and Property Investor articles raising over £4 billion, and smaller developers inviting investments from £10,000 with 10% guaranteed annual returns & buy back deals, the big boys are definitely in the game - from U.K. (& abroad).
From:
A Bhalla
04 April 2022 20:25 PM
Lol 😂 just wondering if the repatriation route into U.K. was via one of the boats 🛶 to then be escorted in comfort to a luxury hotel in Kent, paid for by the govt using PRS LL’s taxes🤔
From:
A Bhalla
21 March 2022 17:06 PM
I second that!
From:
A Bhalla
16 January 2022 13:18 PM
Yep 👍 Death and Taxes are the two certainties in life. People need to accept these facts in every part of the world 🗺, not just in U.K.. Or they need to emigrate to tax exempt nations, Death unfortunately will still occur in due course.
From:
A Bhalla
16 January 2022 13:17 PM
Corbyn and Credibility in the same sentence- that’s funny & outrageous at the same time! Even my 14 year old advised me that she & her friends would Never vote for him & Labour ever. Reasons: Corbyn/Labour offered free Wifi-by contracting out the safety of national infrastructure to a known overseas terrorist leader, no University fees but there was no money in treasury , shook hands with terrorists all the way, with an anti British, anti Working people, anti Enterprise, anti Entrepreneurs, anti Jewish approach favouring non White skin colours, supporting illegal migrants, criminals to blow up British people & visitors in our homelands, inviting illegal immigrants & 5 year old to get voting rights, supporting Sharia laws & making 11 year olds marriage legal - that was good enough for intelligent young students to refuse to ever support Labour political party. I used to be a Labour supporter until Tony Blair damaged our nation whilst filling in his own, wife & kids, relatives bank accounts, creating U.K. & Global real estate & other asset classes multi million pounds portfolio at innocent British civilian & defence services cost. Thanks to Blair & Corbyn-Labour is definitely dead, and needs to stay buried regardless of who the leader is. Starmer & cold blooded ambitious Khan have already shown that they will unashamedly step over dead bodies-especially Jewish, White indigenous, and legal migrant enterprising British people to realise their political ambitions. For Great Britain’s safety & future prosperity Boris has shown overall a great leadership comparable, even better than the scale of Sir Churchill’s leadership to steer Great Britain 🇬🇧 to a truly Democratic, Sovereign, Self Governing, Independent Trading nation. The only other political party alternative to put our Homelands safety First out of terrorists clutches is Britain First.
From:
A Bhalla
16 January 2022 13:12 PM
Michael Foley-I agree. Overall Boris Johnson and team have done a fantastic job for delivery of a Democratic vote 🗳 and leading our nation out of a global pandemic 😷 with the help of scientists advise based policies. Bravo 👏 My vote is for Boris to stay and continue building on the strong foundation work Post pandemic Leadership by winning the next elections. In my opinion, aside from Boris, there are no other strong, decisive leaders who lead from the front, instead of hiding behind others, blaming on other teams/external factors etc, in any of the other political parties to look after the growth of Great Britain as an independent, self governing, sovereign nation - except for Britain First. #borisisbestforbritainsfuture 🇬🇧
From:
A Bhalla
16 January 2022 12:47 PM
Spot on Max Boyne! 👍 Without prejudice-Whoever thinks that Rishi Sunak doesn’t want the fame is clearly brainwashed, or a marketeer or stands to gain by Sunak being appointed PM, or is a completely deluded British unaware of history based significance of the fame & fortune accompanying an Indian (& African migrants) with non White skin colour origins based Prime Minister and the multiple generational financial benefits to that PM’s family as well as a prominent place in the future history! No doubt -Sunak is highly educated & excellent with numbers but is incapable of seeing the bigger picture, create strategies or make tactical moves for the benefit of All British communities on the ground in an emergency situation. Rather Sunak than Abbott/another Labour/or Liberal Chancellor who can’t count up to 10! It has been clearly evident during his calculations of ignoring #ForgottenLtd families, self employed (over 60% of working population) for pandemic support & implementation of IR35 making businesses/workers face severe losses/redundancies. Liz Truss, on the other hand is much more capable of handling a complex turbulent global political landscape and has successfully concluded post Brexit Trade agreements. To sum up, in my opinion, since Churchill Boris has been the next best Prime Minister to having led U.K. out of EU slavery, and a global pandemic to give our present and future generations an opportunity of a lifetime to live in a truly Democratic, Self governing, Sovereign, Self reliant (work in progress) Great Britain 🇬🇧. I and my network would vote for Boris again to give him an opportunity to help U.K. progress after Brexit without a pandemic. Patel and Javid are a dream team to keep the terrorists out/deport criminals, keep British borders secure-Javid got my vote the day he signed the orders to keep the jihadi bride Shamima & her next generations out of U.K./my homeland’s safety, and is now doing a good job in Health ministry, Sunak is ok with Treasury as long he starts taking a balanced local all communities/on the ground businesses based approach, Gove has just announced support for long suffering leaseholders stuck in cladding crisis-this will be a great relief for good LL’s & Tenants alike in PRS & Social tenancy residents, Liz Truss is a fantastic Global Trade Ambassador-Strategic & Tactical politician- just needs to be wary of imperial ambitions of China/Korea/Russia etc & shake off by closing trade agreement legal loopholes to forever keep all nations hands off on British treasure NHS. USA, EU, Canada, Caribbean, China, Russia, Africa & India’s leaders have tried to get their hands on our NHS. #borisisbestforgreatbritainsfuture.
From:
A Bhalla
16 January 2022 12:35 PM
Tricia Urquhart - Insightful! Thanks. M&S’s £13 million less taxes would more than suffice for Shelter/it’s partners to provide housing for these 200,000 children and their families over the winter (plus another 200,000 people). Shelter can build a whole town with schools with £13m, or perhaps buy an island off mainland U.K. to house these allegedly about to be homeless people. Shelter seem to either intending to go into renting sector themselves by marketing these scandalous untruthful headlines against PRS LL’s or perhaps Diane Abbott/or Labour look after Shelter’s finances! Or may be there is a potential embezzlement going on within Shelter, and it’s regulatory auditors. Perhaps PRS sector LL’s need to change themselves into a ‘Not for Profit’ operators/LTD/LLC/LLP/Self Employed etc. to start offsetting All rental operations expenses as charity rules allow it, and marketing as ‘Shelter accommodation’ to make Shelter go out of business. Only an irresponsible parent would make a child stress about the housing situation. Parents had the kids=their job to provide housing, food, clothing, education, and social, respect & self reliance responsibility skills learning to their children-it’s not the Landlords/or anyone else’s role-it’s the parents role & Govts (regardless of whichever political party is in power) needs to be clear about it. Best wishes to all good PRS LL’s, and their good tenants. Merry Christmas 🎄 to All!
From:
A Bhalla
23 December 2021 11:49 AM
Jim Halliburton- Please ensure that people of Emily & David’s caliber take their shoes off before entering your homes. A good PRS landlord must protect their homes, and tenants from dirt-physical & mental!! Best wishes.
From:
A Bhalla
14 December 2021 14:16 PM
The politician in this article, as well as people with similar understanding as David Edmunds need to help renovate homes of Grenfell type cladding blocks tenants whilst people are in situ. It would be funny if not sad to see the legal HSE, rent rebates/withheld, claims from tenants against the estate owners/DE/politician, and nil votes for these senseless agitator Green/Labour/LibDems/other Party politicians with anti PRS agendas. Before blaming PRS Landlords, these useless comment makers need to engage their brains to read up on how many social housing/council homes have extractor fans & yet get mould & condensation. It’s not a matter of PRS Landlords having heard of extractor fans, it’s a matter of tenants not allowing fresh air circulation in their homes, creating issues for false allegations against PRS landlords to save paying the rent/escaping eviction & hoping to get a social/council home, which will inevitably be full of mould due to condensation but as long as that’s what the unscrupulous tenants, politicians and bemoaned want-then be it.
From:
A Bhalla
14 December 2021 14:11 PM
Yep 👍. An audited company should already have contingency reserves. I haven’t used Purple Bricks hence not checked their balance sheet, however their auditors would have definitely advised them to keep reserves, which the CEO & directors likely decided to ignore & put their customers (including PRS Landlords) money at risk instead. Best wishes for a continued success of good, honest PRS landlords, and local agents.
From:
A Bhalla
13 December 2021 09:41 AM
‘pay peanuts 🥜, get monkeys 🐒’ to do any tasks comes to mind. You get what you pay for-simple. The attraction of Low fees/peanuts payments by Purplebricks/and other online agency monkeys claiming great savings will mostly result in disaster for landlords/home owners. Best wishes to all good landlords.
From:
A Bhalla
13 December 2021 09:32 AM
Ah-that explains the reason why homeless people are encouraged by Shelter to seek legal aid, and why Shelter is campaigning for more legal aid. Since their Legal dept. was set up by a judge - who would clearly know the loopholes to easily claim £millions of taxpayers money for ‘legal aid’ to reduce ‘homelessness’. LTA & Housing laws are already unfairly biased to help the unscrupulous tenants- commercial & residential, and Shelter legal team take advantage of this unfairness to line the charity business’s executives bank accounts at the cost of British taxpayers/govt treasury, and private sector landlords. #sheltergateunfolding.
From:
A Bhalla
02 December 2021 21:00 PM
Spot on! There are No prosecutions for Housing Associations CEO’s or Councils as yet for making tenants live in unsafe clad homes. Councils are protecting the Housing associations senior management, and charging the tenants higher rents to cover the cost of cladding! Clearly NRLA exist to support these rogue Councils and Housing Associations instead of protecting PRS small honest landlords who provide safe homes even to rogue tenants to reduce homelessness. Shared ownership social tenants on low incomes are expected to pay multi billions for the Council & Housing Associations to keep them in unsafe fire 🔥 hazard homes, or lose their homes to live on streets as they clearly can’t afford full rents. Letting sector trade body and NRLA need to get their facts right before going after PRS LL’s - prosecutors need to go after the Heads of Councils, and Housing Association’s CEO’s & Board investigating their & family’s PRS portfolio & sending warrants of arrests to their homes, instead of office addresses. This process if managed quietly & executed quickly similar to National Crime Agency raids-might just immediately smoke out the rats in Councils/Social Housing organisations/Shelter et all, as well as from the ministerial benches of All parties & House of Lords. Best wishes to All good PRS landlords and tenants.
From:
A Bhalla
15 November 2021 12:23 PM
Full support, and Best wishes to this Landlord. Based on the limited info in this article, It seems to be a combination of Wrongful, Fraudulent Trading, directors/partners of agency may also be involved in Misfeasance, and Undervalued transactions. Therefore clearly a judge should be able to order in the favour of LL for the Estate agency director/owners to pay the landlord from the business, with the proviso that if there are insufficient funds in the business then Directors/their family’s Personal Capital assets be seized and utilised to pay the creditor/LL. Good Luck.
From:
A Bhalla
12 October 2021 07:07 AM
Andrew T. Spot on! The same tactics are used on a National scale hence there are more ‘single’ mothers/fathers in council homes. Certain communities (and areas) seem to have more ‘single parents’ accommodation requirements. It helps being ‘single’ with children-the whole country then supports them, and their dogs, and illegal migrants who claim to be ‘children’ at the cost of Landlords who first help councils by housing these so called single parents ‘children’, and then by paying high taxes for their high maintenance lifestyles. A double whammy, due to unfair tenant friendly laws & No safety net for PRS LL’s.
From:
A Bhalla
11 October 2021 18:50 PM
😅👏Lol 😂 - great 👍 comment. North South divide - if it’s not the Politicians, it’s HMRC or Research 🧐 statisticians dividing the country!
From:
A Bhalla
11 October 2021 18:35 PM
Spot on Andrew T! Labour is a party of benefit scroungers. They promise everything for free when it’s 🗳 time as if money grows on Jack and The Beanstalk tree 🌳. Anyone with half a brain knows that CoVID19 has depleted money 💰 and resources globally therefore nothing can be for free - except Labour’s free promises. Labour would sell U.K. to EU or a socialist communist, or an African consortium to make Britain’s current, and future generations slaves by losing British identity, by destroying the proud heritage & historic legacy of Great Britain.
From:
A Bhalla
30 July 2021 22:18 PM
Daniel C - If freeloader tenants are so hard up, they should rent a smaller home in a low rent location, or get paid work instead of expecting taxpayers & landlords to pay for the lazy bones you whiners feeling entitled to use others properties for free. .
From:
A Bhalla
30 July 2021 21:58 PM
Lol 😂 This article clearly states that Labour is Anti PRS LL, not Boris (or his cronies as you described)!! If anyone is jealous of Boris’s role in coping with this CoVID19 whilst Brexit was implemented, and keep the country financially & strategically on growth path, they really need their brain examined. Labour or Liberals would definitely not help your sister, unless she wants to live on benefits-then they will promise her help but not deliver as usual. Fyi- It’s Labour who want CPO (compulsory possession orders) of more than 1 property, free homes for renters because they are after they votes 🗳 of students, and lazy people who just wish to live on benefits instead of working to earn an income, look after themselves and buy own homes. Labour didn’t get my vote last time and they won’t get it next time. In my properties No rent = Eviction, no ifs no buts no Labour or Liberals - end of.
From:
A Bhalla
30 July 2021 16:52 PM
🤔Do you mean European big tech companies, with branch offices/legal entities in Slovakia, Romania, Germany, France, Poland, Italy, Switzerland, Morocco, Iran, Qatar, Pakistan etc earning income from U.K. operations? Majority of Projects, and IT contractors who transferred the original data were more than likely EU citizens, got the project completion signed off by the councils, and went back to their homes for the local homeowners to pay the bills for aftermath-standard tactics by EU workers. I know many who used to fly over on Monday morning, back on Friday to their home nation. Thanks to their shoddy work, I operate as an Change Transformation Risk & Compliance director, correcting these type of data errors affecting locals, and protecting consumers rights. American tech co’s have been compliant with DPA from way before GDPR arrived here in 2018, after having faced multi bn$ global law suits from individual as well as corporate customers, speaking from experience as an ex VP of American companies, and consultant of EU organisations who set up outsourced tech co’s. Even India based branches of British, American tech companies now enforce GDPR religiously, & have to take a mandatory multi billion $ insurance for GDPR breaches. Either way - bottom line accountability lies with the incompetent leadership of Oxford council. No surprises that this has happened in Oxford, they probably hire some not so smart ‘leaders’ from Oxford Uni who want to delete the past- British history 🤦♀️, destroy Great Britain whilst getting more funding from taxpayers money 💰.
From:
A Bhalla
23 July 2021 22:39 PM
👍👏 I agree.
From:
A Bhalla
22 July 2021 07:57 AM
Yep 👍 = more homelessness if people can’t live in own homes-including owner occupiers. 🤔Wonder if Jade Lewis & team are providing non repayable funding to all-including owner occupiers of ‘older’ below EPC band C properties for improving the buildings for net zero, and funding will continue from now till 2040. Or is this another tactics to help govt & banks penalise hard working home owners, extract more money from honest taxpayers, and councils issuing compulsory occupation orders for properties below EPC band C? Net zero policy is definitely isn’t related to people’s health and safety-more to do with the Political agenda, and another attack, control of British govt., our laws & policies by United Nations/foreign govts. Best wishes to the future generations, whom our govt & opposition, all MP’s, lawmakers want to live as controlled/enslaved by outsiders policies/laws-despite the majority having already voted for a sovereign, independent, self governing U.K. Parliament to protect British people first. No signs of British people, hard working home owners, or honest LL’s protection as yet, but may be the future generations will correct this, waiting to see that day without holding my breath😅
From:
A Bhalla
22 July 2021 07:55 AM
True. Out of curiosity-What happens if a tenant subsequently gets an animal/pet, without LL’s written permission. LL can’t use a pet as grounds of eviction, and will end up facing the cost of courts for property damage related eviction etc. Example- My previous tenant rent contract was agreed for 3 people (1 adult, 2 children), brought 2 (1 adult & 1 child) subsequently 2 weeks after moving, making the house overcrowded, tactics to get a council house by getting bailiffs order (apparently a common tactics used by Brazilian Portuguese tenants) costing me thousands in eviction alongside council threats related stress. Tenants will likely use/be advised to use the same tactics by councils/agents/CAB/Shelter etc, to sign a tenancy contract first-bring pets later. If anyone has faced this-or has suggestions to help LL’s avoid the cost/stress of rogue tenants bringing in pets after the tenancy starts-please share the wisdom. Q is: How to evict a tenant who brings pet/s after a tenancy starts? Thanks.
From:
A Bhalla
12 July 2021 09:55 AM
👍👏👏
From:
A Bhalla
12 July 2021 09:19 AM
Spot on! #NoPetsinmyproperty. End of. As LL, I am taking a major risk for looking after the health & safety of human/s in my home for £peanuts in return, putting pet animals in the mix makes me a Zoo owner-not a Residential LL. Those tenants who like to live in a zoo should find a zoo, or go to council/shelter/PetScore owner Natasha Homer-Earley‘s home/her pet home etc. #OnlyHumansliveinmyproperty #NoPetsinPrivateTenantedHomes.
From:
A Bhalla
12 July 2021 09:17 AM
£50 weekly more like. A pet is an animal - can’t be referenced - this stupidity of making pets/animals behave unlike their natural character must stop. People who want pets should save & buy own homes to be ruined by their ‘referenced’ pets-not LL’s/others homes. #animalscantbereferenced. #animalsdamageproperties. #Nopetsintenantedproperties.
From:
A Bhalla
12 July 2021 09:06 AM
LTA is certainly Outdated, and Unfairly weighted in favour of tenants. Perhaps LTA Laws should be revised to make it Landlord friendly for a change! Forget being landlord friendly-even allowing a home owner landlord to evict a non paying rogue tenant in fairness, without waiting for nearly a year, losing rent, and incurring high costs in court case against a tenant supported by the local Council, will be a miraculous fairness in LTA laws. Landlord & Tenant Act & revisions may as well be re-named ‘Tenant Favouring Act’. There is 0% fairness towards PRS LL in LTA. There is No protection in LTA/s for LL’s, to protect or recover their hard earned capital assets to evict a rogue, non paying tenant immediately. Councils and tenants have too much power against Landlords in NRLA defined ‘outdated’ Tenant Favouring LTA. #fairnesstowardslandlords #justiceforlandlords #protectionforlandlords is required in Landlord and Tenant Act.
From:
A Bhalla
05 July 2021 10:32 AM
Renters are happy to live in flats or houses - as long as they are provided for free. PRS LL can not afford to provide free housing services, whereas Lloyds bank has got OPM hence can easily do so. Guess time will tell the impact of Lloyds bank strategy on PRS & it’s customers, investors. They will all defect to another bank, when Lloyds Group’s rental income losses would result in nil dividends on investment.
From:
A Bhalla
21 June 2021 10:15 AM
True-Lloyds should help Bristol’s Refugees. Alternatively Bristol mayor could always send those refugees to Generation Rent/National Private Tenants Organisation Limited’s Baroness Kennedy, and other highly paid Directors homes as they would welcome the renters who don’t want to or can not pay rent. This is their opportunity to Lead by Example and give people rent free homes for life by Generation Rent, instead of asking PRS LL’s to face financial losses by non payment of rents, and costly repairs to property due to damage done by tenants/their ‘well behaved, certified trained’ pets. #sendrefugeeestogenerationrenthomes
From:
A Bhalla
21 June 2021 10:09 AM
Robert Brown - A perfect 👍 solution. 👏👏
From:
A Bhalla
17 June 2021 15:55 PM
PossessionFriendUK - I second your suggestion, by adding a minimum £50,000 deposit immediately available to LL in an account without questions as soon as an evidence of pet damage is provided, and unlimited for eviction of tenant, and subsequent refurbishments, rent until a new tenant is found. Best wishes.
From:
A Bhalla
17 June 2021 15:53 PM
David Edmunds, The property remains the Homeowner = Landlords home, Tenant is a temporary resident. The property is not lent, it’s let with the responsibility to look after it whilst the tenant wants to reside by paying the rent on a timely basis, and maintaining it without allowing animals if LL has restricted 🚫 them, or animal like humans inside it. Hence the Homeowner, repeat the Homeowner has every right to dictate who a renter lives with in his/her property -a human, animal or any human of criminal intentions/actions. The next thing tenants/people with your mindset would want is - LL’s can not dictate if a tenant runs a drug, prostitution, animal breeding, terrorist training/similar activities at the homeowners property!! My property, my rules. I’m allergic to animals, my builders are too hence it’s a HSE risk to have pets in my owned properties. Additionally in case these Lords or Freeloader generation rent raise this point- My tenants aren’t allowed to use online, cyber, TV, Cable/Satellite 🛰 services using my property address for any criminal activities from any of my owned properties. It’s the first condition of legal contract. One strike & they are evicted immediately. To sum up-you are absolutely wrong. A LL has 💯% every right to dictate who, and how people live in the homeowners property. Best wishes to your LL, if you are a tenant.
From:
A Bhalla
17 June 2021 15:46 PM
Spot on! There need to be robust safeguards to protect LL’s from unscrupulous tenants making false accusations. My (ex) Brazilian tenant had falsely accused her Boyfriend at the time of being a sex pest. It resulted in him being barred from seeing his daughters, later on DNA results proved her wrong but by that time BF had lost his job & suffered with mental health problems. Being the LL, I felt quite guilty for banning BF from my property-based on a false accusations of the tenant. Eventually I evicted the tenant, who was by then with another BF & used all tactics including pretending to be pregnant 🤰but was unable to produce a medical certificate to confirm it in court. Best wishes to all good LL’s.
From:
A Bhalla
27 May 2021 12:08 PM
True-it’s painful to get a court order but not see the money 💰. I’m still waiting for £20k+ from a court order in 2013 against an Egyptian tenant. They come in All guises - Asian, British, European, Brazilians, Russian, Middle Eastern, African, Australian, Caribbean and American. I have had a run in with all of them-found Israeli, Americans, Caribbean, and APAC region tenants more honest than others. Unfortunately I don’t trust our own British or Asians-specifically from the country beginning with Pa either except for 1 English male tenant of 4 years without probs-Welsh & Scottish had to be evicted for ASB. Anyone wanting to see how the tenants plan to use our soft laws-just join FB - UKVI, or another UK immigration groups, people give advise to unscrupulous tenants about UK laws to take advantage of ‘soft laws’ against LL’s, or join Rent a room, BTL or any of the tenant forums and you will observe that people of all kinds of anti LL plans. Discussions in these groups are an eye opener for me as a LL re what tactics are/will be used by potential future tenants, and which areas are being targeted. Becoming LL should carry a risk ahead warning ⚠️ -definitely not for the faint hearted. Best wishes.
From:
A Bhalla
27 May 2021 09:23 AM
I second MP’s suggestion. 1 week for notice using online gov.uk/MOJ tenant eviction simple forms, online submissions by LL, & 4 week turn around for tenant Eviction Order enforced by Police (instead of waiting another 4-6 weeks for bailiffs) due to No rent (regardless of their circumstances), lack of Property maintenance, tenant refusal to allow access for inspections, tenants overcrowding, HSE dangers reports, or ASB/cannabis farms & similar reports from neigbours- an immediate eviction by the Police, If these solutions are provided to LL’s to protect their capital assets from rogue tenants - I would happily support s.21 abolition. Best wishes.
From:
A Bhalla
27 May 2021 08:55 AM
More than likely none owned in her personal name, all in ‘discretionary’ trusts, Holdings, LLP or company/another family member’s name. Probably also investing into BTR - similar to Sadiq Khan-for own gains whilst kicking the small LL’s by enforced rent controls & delayed evictions policies. They know how to use the system, and have money to pay specialist ‘advisors’=tax lawyers, accountants & HMRC trained inspectors. That’s just how the Lords, Baronesses, & politicians roll - try to check how many properties Blair’s or Corbyn’s & Keir’s/any other Labour/Lib Dem/anti LL socialist politicians own and you will draw a blank. Dig deeper & discretionary structures come to surface, unfortunately for small/accidental good LL’s these politicians would never do the right thing. LL’s have to take matters in iwn hands. Please support Zobia Rafique’s campaign for Justice for LL’s: gofund.me /5c6a74d6 Best wishes to all - including long suffering good LL’s always under attack by Generation Rent & Politicians.
From:
A Bhalla
27 May 2021 08:47 AM
Hi, Thank you for sharing gofundme link. . I suggest please also share it on Facebook in any LL and BTL groups as it will help them understand the challenges faced by good LL’s. Hope you win your case against Acorn/rogue tenants and rogue groups like generation rents who want LL’s hard earned properties for free instead of working to buy a house themselves and take the responsibility of mortgage, property maintenance. Best of luck to yourself and all good LL’s.
From:
A Bhalla
27 May 2021 08:27 AM
👏I second #LLUnite 👆
From:
A Bhalla
18 May 2021 13:07 PM
Spot on Tricia Urquhart! Good LL’s as well as good tenants are suffering due to unfair laws, Shelter and Councils favouring unscrupulous tenants. LL’s are forced to find alternative cost effective methods to protect their homes being rented to help good tenants live there temporarily by contractual agreements. The court should have fined Sheffield council for not providing ‘free’ housing for an unemployed person with child. It’s not LL’s responsibility to provide ‘free’ housing for a lifetime to tenants. Bravo 👏 for Antana Klibavicius for taking a brave, necessary step as a homeowner to protect own property.
From:
A Bhalla
18 May 2021 13:02 PM
I agree with Robert Brown. There is no need to build more house-plenty of houses are on sale. Just searching by properties for sale in London on zoopla comes up with over 10,000+ results reflecting that there are plenty of available homes. 3,000+ in Manchester. Building more houses, and certainly ‘free’ social council houses is NOT the solution. Banning BTL, and foreign companies buying homes, as well as adjusting income:borrowing banking ratios to make it affordable for locals is a better approach. People need to learn to stop asking for ‘free’ housing except for certain categories eg veterans, disabled, and seniors. Other able bodied need to learn to work and save like the home owners (single parents, married couples et all) did in the past, and present times. In any country-there has to be enough land to build houses, and green spaces for natural environmental balance to avoid flooding by land absorption of water, earthquakes, and subsidence of structures. Ultimately U.K. (including Jersey) is a small island 🏝 with limited land mass and can not cope with unlimited homes without damaging the eco balance & risking it’s existence as a nation. Concrete jungles with more buildings will result in more rivers flooding, sea side buildings erosion, earthquakes related destruction until scientists find a way of better methods of protecting land from surrounding seas, retaining green belts and safety of all human beings in an island environment. Sam Mezec’s comments are spot on-but whether the rich 🤑 investors, and politicians will support it-remains to be seen. Best wishes.
From:
A Bhalla
15 May 2021 23:31 PM
In theory that’s the solution to reduce London’s (& all over U.K.) house prices as well by banning BTL investments from UK and overseas based owners. This will automatically reduce prices by supply/demand related economic market forces implications within 6-12 months, and allow more people to get on the property ladder. The suggestion of banning BTL though would upset many politicians, Royal family connections, and rich investors from Middle East, China, Russia, Japan, USA, EU, India etc.-especially when HMRC are allowing companies/spv to buy BTL resulting in an inflow of investment in U.K. (ironically many via Jersey based financial institutions using tax advantages).
From:
A Bhalla
15 May 2021 23:05 PM
Not at all. In fact £7.5 tax threshold needs to be increased. It helps many elderly, or lonely people who may have circumstantially ended up with a few spare rooms but are unable to sell/relocate elsewhere. It helps for them to earn an income, keeps their minds busy, provides for their family, and keeps a person off streets at a lower cost, and if the home owner is lucky to get a longer term bnb guest then it combats the loneliness and reduces resultant mental health issues as well = saving NHS. Rent a room certainly helps many people utilise their home, and provide a roof over others without risking the generation rent scrupulous tenants in the property, and face unfair legal costs for long and stressful evictions. Best wishes to Rent a room users, just about the only good thing done by HMRC to help poor home owners, NHS and renters.
From:
A Bhalla
15 May 2021 22:51 PM
👏👏🙃😶
From:
A Bhalla
15 May 2021 22:28 PM
Since the laws are unfairly in favour of unscrupulous tenants/generation rent - for fairness to all stakeholders there should be 3 open free registers for use by generation rent tenants, and landlords listing criminal records on gov.uk: 1. Tenants register, 2. Letting Agents register, 3. Landlords register. It’s a balanced approach requirement for fairness in justice.
From:
A Bhalla
15 May 2021 22:26 PM
I second that. I would be happy to to support generation rent if they start campaigning for 3 open criminal records registers on gov.uk: 1. Tenants register. 2. Agents register. 3. Landlords register.
From:
A Bhalla
15 May 2021 22:19 PM
Emily Simmons, Good to hear about your positive experiences in South Glos.. I empathise with single parents, but after having had a few bad experiences with working (at the start of tenancy) single mother (Brazilian & Portuguese passports), I would certainly not rent my property to a single parent. And neither will I rent to someone on benefits-even if the council paid me £100 million as a deposit, or as ARO. My tenant rented as a single parent, subsequently brought in her mother, 3 children under 10 with different surnames, and 2 boyfriends within 4 months, then refused to leave when I gave s.21 notice resulting in a cost of over £20k for eviction, bailiffs, lost rent and repairs. Thanks council’s for the offer of deposit, and direct rent payment to landlord but no Thanks. I would rather leave my property vacant then take a council recommended/supported tenant. Best wishes to those LL’s who are happy to do so.
From:
A Bhalla
10 May 2021 16:36 PM
👍Lol 😂 👏
From:
A Bhalla
05 May 2021 18:27 PM
Steve Sykes. I second your stance, and apply the same in my properties. There are no guarantees that even a trained human will not damage properties, so how can a trained pet (owner/trainer) give guarantees that their pet won’t damage anything, or hurt itself, or attack someone etc! I don’t keep pets, stay away from pet owners, prefer humans to animals, and am happy to take the risk of keeping humans as my tenants-not animals/no matter how well trained/certified/guaranteed they are. My, and family’s hard earned money/capital in the form of properties is not going to be wasted on housing anyone’s animals-end of. It’s for humans usage only.
From:
A Bhalla
05 May 2021 18:21 PM
For fairness, and equality, PRS LL’s Demand that Shelter pays the govt grant of £15m to All tenants who have lost income during CoVID19, and are facing an eviction. My point: It’s unlikely that this money will be paid to LL’s, but as a Landlord, I will certainly like to see how Shelter’s solicitors and legal advisors would recover it from those tenants. Popcorn🍿ready.
From:
A Bhalla
28 April 2021 18:49 PM
Fery Lavassani, Spot on! Legal aid solicitors use tactics to avoid S.8 evictions. They advise the tenant to pay a portion of outstanding amounts to delay the court hearings. In my opinion, the tenant should be liable to pay compensation for stress to landlord if an eviction notice is required. No landlord wants to evict good tenants. Only unscrupulous tenants are evicted & one would expect that judge Rinder should be more aware than a layman to make laws fairer for landlords, unless he is getting a great payout by Shelter, or has a political ambition for his future career progression/income source.
From:
A Bhalla
24 April 2021 21:20 PM
The political leaders of Labour and Lib Dem’s are investing in ‘rent only’ developments in London, Bristol and northern cities to grab their share of tenant’s income. The laws in U.K. are unfairly leveraged to protect unscrupulous tenants. This imbalance needs to be redressed to make laws fair towards Private Rental sector landlords. #fairlawsforlandlordprotection campaigns need to be started immediately to evict non paying, anti social unscrupulous tenants immediately.
From:
A Bhalla
21 April 2021 13:19 PM
Tricia Urquhart, I completely agree. This is a publicity ploy by Shelter. If they are against private landlords then why are they building ‘rent only’ developments in majority of cities and encouraging private investors ?? Are these honey traps by Shelter, it’s supporters like Rinder, and unscrupulous tenants, shareholders from Labour and Lib Dem leadership? People like David Edmunds want a ‘lifetime rental’ at the cost of landlords hard work, instead of taking the responsibility of working to buy, maintain, and live in own home. In other words they want the landlords to do the hard work to subsidise these unscrupulous tenants lifestyle for lifetime. There should be fair laws to support landlords with an immediate eviction for non payment of rent, property damage, and anti social behaviours, and 1 months notice if the landlord needs the home for own/family usage. #fairlawsforlandlords #immediateevictionofunscrupuloustenants either by s.21, or by online immediate court orders with the support of police instead of waiting another 2-3 months for bailiffs to evict the tenant.
From:
A Bhalla
21 April 2021 13:13 PM
George Dawes, Spot on! I agree.
From:
A Bhalla
21 April 2021 12:59 PM
Because David wants the private Landlords to handover their property to unscrupulous tenants as a ‘lifetime’ home rather than evict them. He was evicted 7 times by his own admission- it speaks volumes about his behaviours as tenant. All unscrupulous tenants want lifetime rights in tenancies, but won’t be bothered to save up to buy their own house, or pay rent on time, maintain property, leave peacefully after receiving a notice and understand the responsibilities of mortgage, respect, and maintenance of property/ies. These unscrupulous tenants must be stopped immediately by changing our unfair tenant friendly laws to make them fair towards landlords. Tenant should be evicted immediately if they don’t pay, damage property or if the homeowner needs to use the property for own, family usage even if they own another place (after giving 1 week’s notice for fairness towards the tenant) -as they do in Germany. #fairlawsforlandlordsprotection #immediateevictionofunscruploustenants.
From:
A Bhalla
21 April 2021 12:58 PM
David Edmunds - Wrong on every comment in this thread. Tenants do get subsidy, are currently subsidised by the landlords, who are losing rent yet have to pay the taxes for the govt to then subsidise these unscrupulous tenants by protecting their eviction.
From:
A Bhalla
21 April 2021 12:44 PM
S.8 gives more protection to tenants. A well known tactic used & recommended by councils as well as solicitors is (as experienced when evicting our unscrupulous tenants) - Tenant pays part of outstanding rent a few minutes (days/or hours) before the court hearing, and the judge can not issue the eviction order as the tenant has technically ‘paid’, therefore the claimant is technically lying in court. By that time, LL has become liable to pay solicitors and legal costs, alongside facing the stress of lost rent, potential further damage to property by a bad tenant. Fortunately our solicitor had issued s.8, & S.21 notices at the same time, so although the tenant paid 90% of outstanding rent the day before the hearing, court was able to consider S.21 factors abd issue an eviction order, which then had to follow with a bailiff order since the council wanted it to house this tenant-but the LL had to pay for it. Therefore S.21 is required to help evict unscrupulous tenants, who are damaging reputation of good tenants by living off good caring landlords. The total timeline with both S.8 & S.21 was 17 months pre Covid-19 time, it’s even worse now. There has to be an easier online solution to enable eviction of non paying, unscrupulous tenants, and a no fault eviction if the LL’s circumstances change and they need to use their home themselves after giving a notice of 30-60 days. Laws must be fair to all parties but it is clear that the laws are unfair towards Private Landlords, which must be changed. Justice delayed is justice denied to landlords. As many LL’s have commented-nobody evicts a good tenant. Remember which political party not to vote for during the next local, and general elections. Best wishes to all good LL’s and good tenants.
From:
A Bhalla
16 April 2021 09:26 AM
I second that! Baroness must lead by example if genuinely concerned about reducing homelessness.
From:
A Bhalla
16 April 2021 09:04 AM
It’s Labour, and Liberal’s agenda, and Sadiq Khan’s ongoing plan to get OPM (other people’s money) invested in Build to Rent. I support Germany style PRS-pay rent one day late & tenant must leave my property without costing a pence in legal costs, and the stress of long await for a court hearing. Guess one of the solutions for PRS LL’s in London-don't vote for Labour, Liberals, or Green party-they will have both tenants & landlords live in ‘environment friendly’ mud huts 🛖 for green agenda, or put investor’s money 💰 into own pockets whilst using cheap materials for ‘build to rent’-Labour & Liberal’s campaign tag lines, subsequently resulting in lost lives-as Grenfell tragedy- in a Labour run council & council/investors will recover their losses from insurance companies. This only leaves Conservatives as a suitable political party to vote for in London’s forthcoming mayoral elections in May 21. #voteConservatives.
From:
A Bhalla
09 April 2021 00:38 AM
True. I second Darren Simcox’s proposed solution. The courts should allow LL’s to find an eviction enforcement officer instead of waiting for another six months by applying to courts 6 weeks after the eviction order, and then wait further 2-3 months for an available bailiffs to evict an unscrupulous tenant. Pre COVID-19-it took us over 15 months to evict a tenant, purely due to statutory wait times, and court backlogs, further delays due to lack of bailiffs. I would have rather paid the bailiffs/enforcement officers after getting a court order to evict the tenant. It would have saved me a lot of stress, hassle, family relationship impact due to having an unscrupulous tenant who was told to lie by Shelter, C.A.B., and Hounslow council. Fortunately the judge 👨⚖️ saw through it and issued an eviction order immediately. But there was a 9 months wait for the first court hearing, then further 1 month to allow the tenant to leave, further 3 months to get the court to send bailiffs, and another month when bailiffs had an appointment slot available. The worst years of stress for me and my family. Anything to help expedite tenant evictions has to be good news based on my experience. Best wishes to all good LL’s, and fantastic bailiffs helping them.
From:
A Bhalla
31 March 2021 11:21 AM
I second that. #nofundingforcab.
From:
A Bhalla
30 March 2021 11:41 AM
Michael Foley, Absolutely true. One of our tenants used the excuse of being pregnant 🤰 when we issued her with the 1st informal letter requesting to leave after she didn’t pay rent for 2 months. And when we inquired about the father’s responsibility to share the care including the rent, and plans after the baby’s arrival-she went to CAB, who complained to the council as with the baby’s impending arrival and her existing 3 kids of over 6 years of age from different boyfriends/surnames- the property would have become an HMO. All this without the evidence of Dr’s certification of pregnancy confirmation. Fast forward 6 months, at the time of eviction by bailiffs-apparently she was never pregnant when the female bailiff offered to help with the bags, but CAB the ‘charity’ team had suggested her to use pregnancy as a reason to get empathy, not pay rent, and continue staying in our property since as a pregnant lady she won’t be evicted! And being naive/sympathetic LL’s, my husband and I did fall for that scam of pregnancy for over 9 months-losing £20k overall in legal costs and lost rent so now we just do not rent to a anyone under 60’s unless they sign the stipulation in breaching legal housing, overcrowding & HSE rules-including if pregnancy occurs.
From:
A Bhalla
30 March 2021 11:38 AM
Paul OBrien, March 2020 I assume🤔-a whole year’s non payment of rent. Unfortunately you are better off taking help from a solicitor for eviction of these unscrupulous scroungers tenants. There are exceptions to the current eviction ban & these tenants seem to fall into that category. Regardless of your tenants reasons & property location, I would highly recommend contacting Nick Southworth of IBB Solicitors. The team is vey knowledgeable re all types of property litigation matters, and they have branches in multiple locations. Best wishes trying to fight the council’s anti LL idiots, especially if it’s a Labour council.
From:
A Bhalla
30 March 2021 11:11 AM
Spot on! Perhaps a poll of LL’s suffering from rogue tenants supported by free presentations by unscrupulous lawyers, persons of so called ‘good’ characters in Shelter, C.A.B. & Councils would help. I, and I know at least 6 vulnerable elderly (over 60) LL’s would complain about rogue tenants, who got free representation from these ‘charities’ threatening honest LL’s with various false allegations & claims to report LL’s to a judge due to breaches of various laws etc, gratefully the judges saw the sense and threw these cases out of court-albeit at a cost since each LL was forced to pay for legal costs as nothing is free for LL’s. Hounslow C.A.B. & the Council were given a stern warning by the sitting judges to stop abusing honest landlords and house these young, healthy scrounger tenant’s who just wanted everything for free-Labour, Green and Liberal political party supporters-enuf said. I’m including the question re which political party you support-any of the above & my property is not available for rent to these blooming communist, anti LL tenant’s even if they are willing to pay a high rent fir long term tenancy, have great references, and seem genuine people. #supportgoodlandlords.
From:
A Bhalla
30 March 2021 11:00 AM
For a Fair Justice system, there should be a balanced approach = Register or Licensing of Landlords and Tenants with the Landlords being able to access the history of tenants and vice versa.
From:
A Bhalla
09 November 2020 15:26 PM
I second that. And a Fee Free National Govt. maintained database/register of non paying Tenants with LL’s obliged to record rents delayed by 14 days+ within 30 days from the rent due date. Online court systems can check the Tenants database for Eviction claim due to non pay rod rent-if an earlier match of non payment found then auto issue an Eviction Order with Bailiff action within 21 days from the court order. It will be a cost effective, efficient, professional, no blame on anyone court process. It’s the same as checking passport or driving license match on line for various services-sure enough Generation Tenants should be comfortable with a register showing their rent payment/ASB/rental property maintenance etc history etc. It’s only fair to have a regulated LL as well as Tenant license register-paid for by the tenants.
From:
A Bhalla
09 November 2020 15:20 PM
Kudos to JMW Solicitors for a No Win No fee offer to challenge govt and help landlords evict Rogue tenants👏🏼👏🏼 The whole justice system in PRS Residential, as well as Commercial sector needs to be made fairer & balanced for Landlords-it’s weighted 90% in favour of Tenants who take advantage of these unbalanced laws, leaving landlords facing bankruptcies, selling properties and exiting these sectors. It will inevitably increase homelessness. Guess more opportunities for Corporate BTR developers like John Lewis but SME Landlords with 1-5 Residential/Commercial properties will continue struggling until our laws are changed to help landlords. Hope troubled Landlords with rogue tenants in situ will take up this offer from JMW Solicitors, and pave the way for improved laws to help landlords.
From:
A Bhalla
30 October 2020 09:12 AM
👍🏼Seems like a fair and potentially the best Win Win solution for Tenants, LL & Govt (regardless of political party). And due to this fairly balanced approach based process we might - just might - also manage Senior social care in a more empathetic manner to create a better future society for community & elderly generations who mostly like to be looked after by the family/adult children/relatives at home instead of being left on the shelf facing loneliness or an incompetent social care, or sent in care homes to be looked after by strangers. This solution may become a catalyst to change society for the better by resetting traditional close family values, which have almost disappeared in our society. As observed at one of my social tenancy clients (40 & 38) who have been struggling in a 3 bed home with 4 teenagers/adult children but keep refusing to bid to rent a bigger space or let the grandma over 90+ go into a care home for the last 10 years stating that it’s against their family & cultural value to leave elders care to others & social care. It’s the family’s responsibility. Their next generations have learnt the same values-of self reliance & care for family elders being a priority over fighting for a ‘private’ space by conning a Landlord - social or private. All family adults work & pay towards the elderly person’s support at home, alongside sharing the rent and family expenses-& kids are growing up watching a caring family unit creating a society based on self reliance- a win win for all.
From:
A Bhalla
09 October 2020 10:51 AM
🤔Don’t All extortionist councils charge landlords under the existing HMO licensing schemes?? Why another licensing? Councils don’t support the ‘licensed’ LL’s to immediately evict an unscrupulous tenant. So what’s the benefit of licensing for LL’s-it’s just another dictatorship tactic by Councils to enforce LL’s to keep funding rogue tenants. #SayNotoPrivateLandlordLicensing.
From:
A Bhalla
24 September 2020 09:17 AM
I think when Labour and Liberal/or any of the communists favouring councils, MP’s, Judges are involved- it’s not good for the landlords. -Unless the Govt starts supporting landlords with fair laws to evict rogue & non paying tenants with 2 weeks notice, issuing an online eviction order, enforceable by the Police instead of waiting for bailiffs, PRS will shrink with more landlords selling up and more homeless people on streets-or in 4-5* hotels-as some councils are doing. Our laws are in favour of tenants, and an immediate reform is required by the Govt to become fair towards the landlords. At present-even if Anti Social Behaviour of a tenant is reported-Police doesn’t take any action. Police officers might just about have a ‘chat’ with the tenant, log a report to provide a reference number for court case but don’t even take the anti social tenants to the police station in custody or issue any legal documents forcing them to stop the tenant’s unacceptable actions. #FairLawsForLandlords to support PRS by #SimpleEvictionProcess to evict rogue, and non paying tenants for a balanced approach, low court cost and fairness towards both parties-the landlord and the tenant.
From:
A Bhalla
19 August 2020 22:38 PM
Jahan Khan, It makes sense to have an effective solution for UK govt - strengthen section 21, by eviction support from Police. It will save govt the cost of Legal administrators, judges time, Police costs especially in cases of unruly tenants using other people’s property for growing cannabis farms, and/or those disturbing neighbors peace, damaging landlords assets etc-Win Win for the govt, and the councils since they can then claim further funds to ‘build to rent only’ latest trend of council funded homes & put up all homeless tenants there. #RobustS21 is certainly required - if the Govt is willing to implement a realistic solution.
From:
A Bhalla
29 July 2020 12:00 PM
David Crisp, Spot on!👍🏼
From:
A Bhalla
28 July 2020 12:21 PM
Ha ha 😂 Mark Wilson - Mum an Pop (your words) landlords have had enough of providing a free ride for tenants with your type of Labour Liberal Communist Anarchist mindset-who want everything to be given for free to tenants by the Landlords, who have worked hard to save up, buy properties and have the courage to take the risk of operating as a business whilst helping to house others. It’s Not the responsibility of landlords to house the spoilt brat rogue tenants making their own mum an pop’s life miserable hence kicked out of the family home, unwilling to work hard, or if working then not willing to save up to pay the market rent and/or take the responsibility of buying their own home without mum an pop landlords, or own mum and pop’s help with a house purchase. Simple rule written in Law for every tenant & landlord-Public and Private sector: Don’t Pay-Evict them.
From:
A Bhalla
28 July 2020 12:16 PM
🤔Why is NRLA calling for ‘loans’ instead of non repayable ‘Grants’ for Landlords? Is NRLA team inept at reading statistics-or knowing that it’s not just BTL investors who let properties in residential sector but it’s the main source of income for many others as well! Rental income is an ‘Income’ from a job hence similar to JRS, SEISS schemes by Rishi Sunak, there should be a ‘Grant’ available for PRS LL’s affected with the Loss of income due to CoVID19. NRLA and other LL representatives should be championing the cause for All landlords-not just BTL ones-to influence the govt to provide unconditional financial grants for as long as PRS LLs are impacted by CoVID19 related delays iin regards to eviction of Rogue non paying tenants.
From:
A Bhalla
27 July 2020 11:40 AM
Ingrid Mott, Small landlords are losing out as Self employed, and as a Business alike. #ForgottenLtd directors are not receiving any govt help either-as usual due to discriminatory laws against PRS LL’s-it’s a Lose Lose situation for small Landlords-both in Residential and Commercial property sector since the no gooders Liebour Liberals, councils, judges and laws favour unscrupulous tenants/lodgers.
From:
A Bhalla
26 July 2020 17:47 PM
Roslyn Day, Spot on! I know one LL who is facing exactly the same scenario after having been made redundant from a role away from her main home, which she had rented whilst relocating for work. She is now unable to return home because the tenant is in situ, not paying rent, and can not be evicted - a disastrous outcome thanks to Govt’s discriminatory policies against LL’s. Currently there is no United Landlords group to lobby the Govt for fairness and to stop discrimination towards LL’s. There is clearly a requirement for good Human Rights lawyers to issue a joint lawsuit against the Govt. and/or Rogue tenant supporting Mayors/MP’s/Councils to start protecting LL’s from govts stealth rogue practices making Landlords suffer. A few of my PRS LL associates have decided to leave our properties (Leeds, London, Bucks and Surrey) vacant rather than rent and then face huge eviction costs. Local council’s approached us to rent to them, even to help convert to HMO’s but we have declined due to Govt’s unfair discriminatory policies towards LL’s. We will decide in due course whether to sell or hold the properties or if the LL’s are empowered to evict rogue tenants then may be rent them again. In the absence of LL supporting policies allowing for immediate/1 week eviction of non paying/rogue tenants damaging property, PRS is clearly a waste of time & energy, and lack of a group of legal eagles protecting LL’s Human Rights only makes it worse.
From:
A Bhalla
23 July 2020 11:22 AM
Hopefully it will also be a very loud lobby for Govt to contend with, by raising LL’s Human rights and Unfair discrimination against LL’s in Govt. Policies. The Govt excluded rental income in SEISS or JRS for COVID19 support. Self employed, especially many Elderly pensioners had invested their money in buying 1 rental property to supplement meagrely pensions. Many of them are suffering now as rental income is not part of SEISS, they can not claim UC due to property values and paper income not paid by the tenant-whilst the tenant is taking advantage of Govt support. Clearly an unfair discrimination is happening against LL’s, which even a vision impaired person can see but not the Govt., Judges, Lawmakers & Liberal Liebour rogue tenants supporters. There needs to be a new policy to remove unfair discrimination towards LL’s ‘Don’t pay, Evict today’ should be the Govt.policies mantra for evicting non paying rogue tenants for fairness, and equality towards All parties in this industry sector.
From:
A Bhalla
23 July 2020 10:59 AM
Andrew townshend - Wow, great to hear that you managed to change the locks without a court order. To increase my & other reader’s knowledge - 1. Did the Police allow yourself to change locks? During the eviction cases where I have assisted LL’s as a local volunteer in multiple London Boroughs, & Police were involved-they said that it’s a criminal offence to change locks without a court order by making tenants/even lodgers homeless. 2. Please advise which Council covers your let propert/ies? So that when a similar case happens, we can advise the LL’s or solicitors to refer to this Council/Police for help based on the case history. Thanks for sharing your experiences to help other LL’s.
From:
A Bhalla
22 July 2020 14:35 PM
P. Barrett, Absolutely true! Private Landlords and their family’s Human Rights are being ignored by Shelter, London Mayor, and Labour as well as Liberals housing advisors & current govt. Rogue and DSS tenants costs are making LL’s face bankruptcy & suffering from stress resultant mental health due to unfair Govt policies. But there is no organisation to support LL’s/their family’s human rights. Unless LL’s themselves become homeless - Shelter, Council or the Govt won’t support them. Clearly there is a gap for an influential group working with cunning lawyers, barristers to help protect PRS Landlords Human rights. More so an immediate law is required to protect Landlords Human rights against rogue tenants, shelter, and rogue councils housing teams by empowering Police to help LL’s evict tenants after an eviction notice period’s expiry without any requirements of an expensive court hearing, order, and secondary order, eviction by bailiffs.
From:
A Bhalla
18 July 2020 22:51 PM
Mr. Wilson, Fyi-More than 3 people read these posts🤨. Just wondering if you are working with Diane Abbott, and/or just another useless advisors feeding inaccurate data to Labour’s Housing Assembly, MHCLG and to the worst London Mayor. Mr. Crisp is absolutely correct. And as Mr. Andrew Townshend has pointed out - a vulnerable person is Council’s, Not a Private landlord’s responsibility. Private sector Landlords operate an honest business, without stealing money 💰 from govt. like Liebour Councils, and rubbish Mayor of London.
From:
A Bhalla
18 July 2020 17:35 PM
Shelter is using creative data analytics manipulation to show their organisation needs funding to support tenants and to change laws not to evict rogue tenants, but by doing so they will shoot themselves in foot. In a scenario that no tenants were evicted and no homelessness = no requirement for Shelter charity, shut it down. Landlords are also suffering due to CoVID19. Rogue tenants eviction should be a straightforward 1 week process without requiring court/judge’s precious time or involvement. Instead an online system of 1 month’s online notice with evidence of delivery, if no rent paid then online Bailiffs order can be printed to evict tenants. Simple: don’t pay-don’t stay. Laws should be simplified to save courts and taxpayers costs, by stopping rogue tenants abuse current tenant favouring laws. #SupportLandlords #ChangeUnfairTenantFriendlyLaws #SimplifyExpediteEvictionofRogueTenants #DontPayDontStay #LandlordTenantLawOverhaulforFairnesstoLandlords.
From:
A Bhalla
06 July 2020 11:33 AM
Labour and Liberal Left wing communists need to recognise the value of BTL and overall PRS Landlords. Boris Johnson and Rishi Sunak need to change the laws to balance them to encourage landlords instead of the law supporting rogue tenants-in every rental sector- BTL, PRS, Commercial. #ChangeRentingLawstohelpLanflords. #StopDiscriminationagainstLandlords.
From:
A Bhalla
15 June 2020 09:26 AM
The law society and govt. should compensate the landlords for 100% of unpaid rental income during pandemic, in the similar manner as it’s helping tenants with benefits, furlough, loans and other schemes. Residential BTL or Owner shared property landlords are not even entitled to Council tax or utilities bills reduction, yet they have to unfairly face a reduction in rental income, and an eviction ban. Where is the fairness in justice from the law society, which promotes itself on being fair to all parties seeking justice?? One wonders what’s happening to our legal system-when the law society members and MP’s start favouring the rogue elements on a national scale instead of being one of the world famous justice system for fairness based rulings. It’s a disgraceful decision by the Law Society & Govt. showing consistent unfair, discriminatory Bias towards the landlords, pushing many Landlords into financial ruins, and mental health illnesses, depression, anxiety to the extent of considering suicide. It begs the question-is the Law Society fit for purpose in England and Wales or should the govt create another regulatory Law organisation for 100% Fairness based justice to all sections of communities including Landlords? I would vote for a new Law organisation, or a separate unit for Fairness towards Landlords.
From:
A Bhalla
10 June 2020 10:06 AM
Guess Labour’s Abbott must have been doing counting for rental arrears to be paid back in 2 years for a 6/9/12/18 months tenancy!! It won’t take rogue tenants to figure out to not pay rent, and then disappear in thin air before 2 years rental/court term expiry. Or is Labour looking go turn Residential tenancies on par with Commercial- long term tenancies with no protection for landlords who worked hard to save up and buy property/ies? If the Govt want UK property sector to remain an attractive investment proposal, they won’t agree to any of Labour’s proposals. No one would want to invest in UK property if there is no protection for landlords-especially international investors will stop inward investments at a time when UK is flying it’s flag as an attractive Real Estate market in international trade negotiations. #ProtectLandlords for a thriving #UKInboundInvestment #ThrowAwayLabourPlans to save #UKEconomy.
From:
A Bhalla
11 May 2020 11:12 AM
Labour and Liberals are Socialist parties, encouraging people to live on benefits when there are plenty of jobs available due to EU workers departure. They will definitely lose the current pool of Labour voters as well for the next elections. Landlords must ensure not to vote for Labour or Liberal party in local and general elections.
From:
A Bhalla
11 May 2020 10:53 AM
Luigi Kipplewich I agree with your point. For fairness, if Tenants want the benefit of Landlords payment holiday as a reduced/nil rent for 3 months, they should also agree to pay the Increased rent for the duration of their stay. The mortgage provider is going to continue charging the higher monthly mortgage payments regardless of whether the tenant pays or not. Tenants want benefit now, they need to take responsibility for higher future rents or leave.
From:
A Bhalla
29 April 2020 09:14 AM
Lorem Ipsum dolor sit amet
Viewed From: Breaking News
Today 14:58
Lorem Ipsum dolor sit amet
Viewed From: Video Archieve
Today 14:58
Portal Discussions
Joined Group From: Your Community
Today 14:58
Lorem Ipsum dolor sit amet
Viewed From: Industry View
Today 14:58
Lorem Ipsum dolor sit amet
Viewed From: Industry View
Today 14:58
Lorem Ipsum dolor sit amet
Conversation Comment in: Interior Design
Today 14:58
×
Send a message
Message
×
Write on Wall
Message
×
Send a message
Reply to:
Message
Breaking News
Changes to Renters Reform Bill after Easter
Call for “sentencing guidelines” to punish landlords over licensing
Politicians propose State Control of private rents in Scotland
Lawyers ask: Why is Gove delaying ground rent reform?
Rents soar by almost half since 2014 - deposit service’s latest claim
Build To Rent deal emphasises eco-efficiency and wellbeing
Jail for landlord who put lives of tenants at fire risk
Councils set to grab over half a billion from higher tax
Renters Reform Bill shock for Generation Rent and Shelter
Energy costs could vary according to time of day
A's Recent Activity
From: A Bhalla
21 September 2023 08:16 AM
From: A Bhalla
21 September 2023 08:12 AM
From: A Bhalla
27 July 2023 09:00 AM
From: A Bhalla
25 July 2023 08:40 AM
From: A Bhalla
25 July 2023 08:33 AM
From: A Bhalla
18 July 2023 09:35 AM
From: A Bhalla
07 July 2023 09:26 AM
From: A Bhalla
20 June 2023 23:33 PM
From: A Bhalla
19 June 2023 08:10 AM
From: A Bhalla
01 June 2023 18:40 PM
From: A Bhalla
24 May 2023 08:14 AM
From: A Bhalla
27 February 2023 08:00 AM
From: A Bhalla
17 February 2023 08:15 AM
From: A Bhalla
16 February 2023 07:47 AM
From: A Bhalla
16 February 2023 07:32 AM
From: A Bhalla
25 November 2022 08:39 AM
From: A Bhalla
25 November 2022 08:26 AM
From: A Bhalla
24 November 2022 11:28 AM
From: A Bhalla
29 October 2022 23:10 PM
From: A Bhalla
12 October 2022 23:32 PM
From: A Bhalla
12 October 2022 11:29 AM
From: A Bhalla
12 October 2022 11:23 AM
From: A Bhalla
12 October 2022 11:19 AM
From: A Bhalla
12 October 2022 08:54 AM
From: A Bhalla
30 August 2022 11:03 AM
From: A Bhalla
30 August 2022 10:45 AM
From: A Bhalla
13 July 2022 10:57 AM
From: A Bhalla
13 July 2022 10:40 AM
From: A Bhalla
13 July 2022 10:24 AM
From: A Bhalla
13 July 2022 10:20 AM
From: A Bhalla
10 July 2022 16:27 PM
From: A Bhalla
09 July 2022 09:54 AM
From: A Bhalla
09 July 2022 09:39 AM
From: A Bhalla
29 June 2022 09:11 AM
From: A Bhalla
22 June 2022 12:36 PM
From: A Bhalla
10 April 2022 17:11 PM
From: A Bhalla
10 April 2022 16:58 PM
From: A Bhalla
04 April 2022 20:25 PM
From: A Bhalla
21 March 2022 17:06 PM
From: A Bhalla
16 January 2022 13:18 PM
From: A Bhalla
16 January 2022 13:17 PM
From: A Bhalla
16 January 2022 13:12 PM
From: A Bhalla
16 January 2022 12:47 PM
From: A Bhalla
16 January 2022 12:35 PM
From: A Bhalla
23 December 2021 11:49 AM
From: A Bhalla
14 December 2021 14:16 PM
From: A Bhalla
14 December 2021 14:11 PM
From: A Bhalla
13 December 2021 09:41 AM
From: A Bhalla
13 December 2021 09:32 AM
From: A Bhalla
02 December 2021 21:00 PM
From: A Bhalla
15 November 2021 12:23 PM
From: A Bhalla
12 October 2021 07:07 AM
From: A Bhalla
11 October 2021 18:50 PM
From: A Bhalla
11 October 2021 18:35 PM
From: A Bhalla
30 July 2021 22:18 PM
From: A Bhalla
30 July 2021 21:58 PM
From: A Bhalla
30 July 2021 16:52 PM
From: A Bhalla
23 July 2021 22:39 PM
From: A Bhalla
22 July 2021 07:57 AM
From: A Bhalla
22 July 2021 07:55 AM
From: A Bhalla
12 July 2021 09:55 AM
From: A Bhalla
12 July 2021 09:19 AM
From: A Bhalla
12 July 2021 09:17 AM
From: A Bhalla
12 July 2021 09:06 AM
From: A Bhalla
05 July 2021 10:32 AM
From: A Bhalla
21 June 2021 10:15 AM
From: A Bhalla
21 June 2021 10:09 AM
From: A Bhalla
17 June 2021 15:55 PM
From: A Bhalla
17 June 2021 15:53 PM
From: A Bhalla
17 June 2021 15:46 PM
From: A Bhalla
27 May 2021 12:08 PM
From: A Bhalla
27 May 2021 09:23 AM
From: A Bhalla
27 May 2021 08:55 AM
From: A Bhalla
27 May 2021 08:47 AM
From: A Bhalla
27 May 2021 08:27 AM
From: A Bhalla
18 May 2021 13:07 PM
From: A Bhalla
18 May 2021 13:02 PM
From: A Bhalla
15 May 2021 23:31 PM
From: A Bhalla
15 May 2021 23:05 PM
From: A Bhalla
15 May 2021 22:51 PM
From: A Bhalla
15 May 2021 22:28 PM
From: A Bhalla
15 May 2021 22:26 PM
From: A Bhalla
15 May 2021 22:19 PM
From: A Bhalla
10 May 2021 16:36 PM
From: A Bhalla
05 May 2021 18:27 PM
From: A Bhalla
05 May 2021 18:21 PM
From: A Bhalla
28 April 2021 18:49 PM
From: A Bhalla
24 April 2021 21:20 PM
From: A Bhalla
21 April 2021 13:19 PM
From: A Bhalla
21 April 2021 13:13 PM
From: A Bhalla
21 April 2021 12:59 PM
From: A Bhalla
21 April 2021 12:58 PM
From: A Bhalla
21 April 2021 12:44 PM
From: A Bhalla
16 April 2021 09:26 AM
From: A Bhalla
16 April 2021 09:04 AM
From: A Bhalla
09 April 2021 00:38 AM
From: A Bhalla
31 March 2021 11:21 AM
From: A Bhalla
30 March 2021 11:41 AM
From: A Bhalla
30 March 2021 11:38 AM
From: A Bhalla
30 March 2021 11:11 AM
From: A Bhalla
30 March 2021 11:00 AM
From: A Bhalla
09 November 2020 15:26 PM
From: A Bhalla
09 November 2020 15:20 PM
From: A Bhalla
30 October 2020 09:12 AM
From: A Bhalla
09 October 2020 10:51 AM
From: A Bhalla
24 September 2020 09:17 AM
From: A Bhalla
19 August 2020 22:38 PM
From: A Bhalla
29 July 2020 12:00 PM
From: A Bhalla
28 July 2020 12:21 PM
From: A Bhalla
28 July 2020 12:16 PM
From: A Bhalla
27 July 2020 11:40 AM
From: A Bhalla
26 July 2020 17:47 PM
From: A Bhalla
23 July 2020 11:22 AM
From: A Bhalla
23 July 2020 10:59 AM
From: A Bhalla
22 July 2020 14:35 PM
From: A Bhalla
18 July 2020 22:51 PM
From: A Bhalla
18 July 2020 17:35 PM
From: A Bhalla
06 July 2020 11:33 AM
From: A Bhalla
15 June 2020 09:26 AM
From: A Bhalla
10 June 2020 10:06 AM
From: A Bhalla
11 May 2020 11:12 AM
From: A Bhalla
11 May 2020 10:53 AM
From: A Bhalla
29 April 2020 09:14 AM