Landlord strikes deal with council to plead guilty to offences

A rogue landlord who created false identities and fake lcompanies as part of an elaborate web of misinformation designed to exploit his tenants has been fined £12,000 and ordered to pay the council’s £25,000 of costs.  

Thomas Flight pleaded guilty at Bristol Crown Court to committing consumer protection offences against his tenants.

After several hearings, an agreement was reached between Flight and the council for him to plead guilty to four of the six charges against him.

From June 2019 until January 2021, numerous complaints were received by the council about a property management business operating in Bristol. 

According to a council statement, the business went by a number of different trading names, meaning no one ever really knew who they were dealing with or who was responsible when problems arose.

An investigation by council officers uncovered evidence of multiple consumer protection offences. In order to establish who was behind the operation, the team’s Trading Standards officer traced payments back to Thomas Flight, who had used different companies and trading names to receive rent, fees and deposits.

Flight’s identity was hidden from his tenants, allowing him to keep security deposit money instead of returning it, and to avoid responsibility for a number of unfair commercial practices including charging banned and hidden fees to tenants.

Tenants would receive made-up landlord and letting agent information, including false names and addresses. 

Flight even went so far as to have a fictitious person registered as a director of one of his companies. Tenants who complained were then harassed with demands to withdraw their valid enquiries, until the local authority took up these complaints as part of their investigation. 

In February 2021, Flight was interviewed by the council in relation to alleged criminal offences. Following this interview, he voluntarily repaid those tenants who had been charged banned fees or whose security deposits had not been returned to them when they should have been.

However - according to the council - during this interview, Flight failed to cooperate, blaming the situation on an alleged letting agent who couldn’t be traced and is believed to be another of his inventions.

At one of Flight’s court hearings in relation to this case, he supplied further documents to Bristol council containing more landlord details that also proved to be false.

Councillor Tom Renhard, cabinet member for housing delivery and homes, says: “We are committed to protecting people across the city from rogue landlords, especially during the national cost-of-living and housing crises.

“Mr Flight took advantage of tenants and that is simply not acceptable. We will continue to do all we can to pursue unscrupulous landlords where evidence of criminal exploitation is found.”

The council statement makes a point of saying that Flight has not been banned from letting properties as these numerous offences are not Banning Order offences under the Housing and Planning Act 2016.

Want to comment on this story? Our focus is on providing a platform for you to share your insights and views and we welcome contributions.
If any post is considered to victimise, harass, degrade or intimidate an individual or group of individuals, then the post may be deleted and the individual immediately banned from posting in future.
Please help us by reporting comments you consider to be unduly offensive so we can review and take action if necessary. Thank you.