x
By using this website, you agree to our use of cookies to enhance your experience.
Graham Awards

TODAY'S OTHER NEWS

Labour Mayor backs call for vast increase in landlord licensing

The Labour Mayor of Newham in London has called for a vast extension of landlord licensing.

Rokhsana Fiaz says she welcomes a call for the proliferation of licensing regimes made by a think tank, the Centre for London.

Fiaz describes he council as “the national pioneer in Private Rented Sector licensing” acting in what she calls “a totally broken housing market.”

Advertisement

She complains that her council needs to consult with the government over licensing, and says: “Despite its recognised success, since 2015 the council has been forced to seek government approval for its scheme every five years, which is a highly costly and bureaucratic process, and takes funding and resources away from our ability to enforce and improve standards.

“I back calls for private rental sector licensing powers to be devolved to local authorities like Newham, who know their own housing markets and how best to regulate them. There must also be a substantial increase in trained staff and funding to local authorities to allow effective enforcement of the PRS.

“Any Property Portal for a National Landlord register, as referred to in the recent Renters Reform Bill proposals, must be designed to work alongside - and in tandem with - local authority licensing schemes and not replace them.”

Newham’s last Licensing Scheme (which expired at the end of February 2023) saw 42,000 properties licensed – of which 70 per cent were subject to officer visits or audits. And the council claims that since the start of the Covid-19 pandemic, an average of 800 licensing compliance inspections have been undertaken each month to check on property conditions, safety and management.

Newham’s new licensing scheme, which covers the whole borough (with the exception of Stratford Olympic Park and Royal Victoria Wards) went live yesterday  the cost of a full Selective Licence is £750. 

The Centre for London claims to have “a unique London-first point of view” which “allows us to find fresh connections between issues and understand how they shape Londoners’ lives.”

In a report on the private rental sector it demands three radical changes to be made by the government.

"1. Reinstate local authorities’ ability to introduce selective licensing schemes independently, by revoking the provision of the 2015 General Approval that required confirmation from the Secretary of State for schemes covering 20 per cent or more of the borough. To complement this, the government should legislate an advisory role for combined authorities and the Greater London Assembly to promote the good design, harmonisation, and rationalisation of schemes, and to protect local authorities from vexatious judicial reviews. Councils outside of combined authorities should be consulted on alternative ways of fulfilling this advisory function."

"2. Invest in the local authority housing enforcement workforce to address the shortage of qualified personnel. This should include increasing funding for apprenticeships and graduate traineeships, as well as exploring the potential for a Housing Skills Centre to train future enforcement staff."

"3. Allow local authorities to enforce problems with property conditions through selective licensing. This would require amending the Housing Act 2004 to allow hazards within the housing health and safety rating system (HHSRS), which are currently governed by Part 1 of the Housing Act, to be regulated through the selective licensing system. This would remove the inefficiencies related to the 24-hour notice period required for HHSRS inspections, and could also enable councils to attach works conditions to selective licences related to Part 1 issues – so that their continuation can be made conditional on landlords making improvements to the property."

You can read the full report here.

Want to comment on this story? Our focus is on providing a platform for you to share your insights and views and we welcome contributions.
If any post is considered to victimise, harass, degrade or intimidate an individual or group of individuals, then the post may be deleted and the individual immediately banned from posting in future.
Please help us by reporting comments you consider to be unduly offensive so we can review and take action if necessary. Thank you.

  • icon

    I lived in Newham. What a rotten council, one of the reasons I sold up and moved out.

  • icon

    She understands nothing about housing, it too expensive for her to apply for renewal every 5 years but its fine to burden Thousands Private Sector Landlords it doesn’t matter how much it costs them.
    What is it about Mayor’s they are not capable of anything, it has to be free money all the time a money for nothing grab, to keep them in fat jobs how useless can they be, it doesn’t matter what Businesses they destroy

  • icon

    Another nail in the PRS coffin ⚰️

  • Ferey Lavassani

    She ignorantly fails to understand that any financial burden on any business such as PRS, will be passed on to the end user. In our case, poor Mr. John Smith the tenant. They wonder why rents keep going up.

  • icon

    But I do agree her point to invest in the local authority housing enforcement workforce to address the shortage of qualified personnel
    Since the coalition cut-backs in 2013 enforcement against criminals has declined substantially leaving decent landlords paying for licensing and getting no benefit.

  • icon

    John Chart remarks:

    We have a rented out flat in Newham for which we were compelled to "buy" a licence a few years back.
    Since then - no contact from anybody - nothing. So for what did we have to wrestle with admin and pay good money? Zilch! In our case it is just another tax !

  • icon

    AH yes its lovely for her being the Mayor of Newham she must be really struggling on £91’000. per year.
    Yet its too much trouble for her to Apply for Renewal of Selective Licensing every 5 years but it’s ok to burden Landlords to Apply every 5 years and pay thousands of pounds in Council fees apart from the costs of Compliance. Clearly she’s not fit for purpose and should resign, what a waste of tax payers money.

  • icon

    Newham Borough gives us all a bad name. First Council to introduce Borough wide licensing Scheme following reports in 2013 that there were 27’000 landlords, yet anyone earning over £2500, were required to make a self assessment return, low and behold 13’000 didn’t register for tax so didn’t pay any.
    Costing other taxpayers £200 million, in a Borough where the masses milk the System, even a Councillor had to resign over housing fraud,

icon

Please login to comment

MovePal MovePal MovePal
sign up