A new additional HMO licensing scheme is about to hit landlords in part of London.
Haringey council claims its initiative aims to protect private renters and ensure landlords take maximum responsibility for maintaining effective and appropriate management of their properties.
This follows on from a 12-week consultation where residents were encouraged to share their opinions. The feedback apparently revealed that a considerable number of HMOs in the borough are still being poorly managed, leading to issues for both occupants and the wider community.
The licensing applies to landlords who let their property to at least three people who are not from the same household but share facilities such as a bathroom and kitchen are now required to hold an additional license. This also includes properties converted into self-contained flats that do not meet building regulations.
A council statement says: “Using a robust approach by taking enforcement action against landlords who fail to obey their legal requirements, council officers have been able to proactively tackle properties in poor conditions as well as identify properties at risk through the scheme’s inspection programme. This important work will continue with the new additional HMO licencing scheme now approved.”
And a council spokesperson adds: “It is vital that our residents have access to secure and well- maintained housing. Nearly half of Haringey's population are renting privately, and it is estimated that a quarter of these homes are not being adequately maintained.
“This scheme allows us to more closely regulate the landlord industry, supporting our many good local landlords while empowering council officers to take legal action against those landlords that let substandard properties.
“The health and safety of our residents will always be at the top of our agenda and this is another step forward towards their welfare. Landlords who rent out HMO properties are strongly encouraged to obtain a license promptly to avoid enforcement actions by our team.”
Want to comment on this story? Our focus is on providing a platform for you to share your insights and views and we welcome contributions.
If any post is considered to victimise, harass, degrade or intimidate an individual or group of individuals, then the post may be deleted and the individual immediately banned from posting in future.
Please help us by reporting comments you consider to be unduly offensive so we can review and take action if necessary. Thank you.
.png)
Join the conversation
Jump to latest comment and add your reply
I would believe that this was all about improving standards IF they tackled their own social housing FIRST.😡 The MAJORITY of problems are reported by social housing tenants, not PRS tenants.🤬
Double Standards 🫣🤷♂️ It’s what they all do.
I hope that they will publish the full consultation result including the objections made to further additional licensing.
As an unfortunate Haringey LL they have published their replies to all the well thought out reasonable objections but just ignored / rejected them as they are chasing the money for fees. The consultations are always a joke. I think even a significant number of tenants replied say no to it as it would hike their rents as LL exit or pass compliance costs to them via rent increase. This Labour council like all others in London don't care. They just want the new labour government to 'devolve' them powers to control rents one day.ie. it may happen sooner than all us LLs think in hot spot city areas!
"Nearly half of Haringey's population are renting privately" - which means more than half are social housing tenants!
"it is estimated that a quarter of these homes are not being adequately maintained" - in other words they have no idea, but it sounds good as a justification to charge more fees.
Talk about greed and not seeing the big picture!!! Have they learned nothing from Scotland's mistakes? It will just cause LL to leave the PRS which means less available housing and higher rents - thus ultimately it's Tenants who suffer - dimwits!
So double licence. What’s the initial one for. More money for councillors to pamper to tenants. Probably going to throw em an Easter then Xmas party. Need PLL to pay. Tw a t s .
Please login to comment