The National Residential Landlords Association predicts that the House of Lords is unlikely to make substantive changes to the Renters Reform Bill.
The Bill completed its passage through the Commons last week, culminating in four hours of debate over a string of amendments, mostly from the government.
It took a year to complete its Commons stages but is thought to have no more than a few months in the Lords before it becomes law - providing a General Election doesn’t intervene, killing the Bill should polling day happen before the Lords stages complete.
Now Chris Norris, policy director at the NRLA, says: “Traditionally debate in the Lords is more lengthy and extensive than that in the Commons, and over the coming weeks we are likely to hear lot of noise about further amendments to the legislation.
“Lots of peers with an interest in housing will table amendments for debate which are highly unlikely to be adopted by the Government.
“However, the Bill will probably continue its progress through Parliament largely unchanged.”
Labour has said it will not oppose the Bill as it stands and the Conservative majority in the Commons has the right to reverse any changes made in the Lords that would alter the nature of the Bill.
Norris acknowledges that it’s difficult to predict exactly how long the remaining stages of the Bill will take to complete, but having taken a year to traverse the Commons it is possible that its passage through the Upper House could be complete by the autumn.
Norris concludes: “What has happened … represents a huge step forward for the Government, after fears they may run out of time to have the legislation passed ahead of a general election.
“We are confident the Bill as it stands delivers a balance for landlords and tenants and it is in the interests of both that the Bill passes smoothly through these final stages. The alternative is yet more uncertainty, and the prospect of another bill courtesy of the next government.”
Want to comment on this story? Our focus is on providing a platform for you to share your insights and views and we welcome contributions.
If any post is considered to victimise, harass, degrade or intimidate an individual or group of individuals, then the post may be deleted and the individual immediately banned from posting in future.
Please help us by reporting comments you consider to be unduly offensive so we can review and take action if necessary. Thank you.
.jpg)
Join the conversation
Jump to latest comment and add your reply
Horsefeathers! 🤪If the NRLA told me it was going to be a sunny day, I’d take my umbrella.
The NRLA sounds like the mouthpiece of this Government all the time.
The removal of current Conservative politicians either by letters of no confidence or by a general election are what will cause significant changes to the legislation.
Most of them will probably be asleep
Yet another house of fools
This is David Smith's interpretation of when Section 21 will be abolished:
"The Renters (Reform) Bill has now passed through its report stage and third reading in the House of Commons and will, presumably fairly shortly, begin its passage in the House of Lords. As at the committee stage it was extensively amended again, although a lot of the amendments were more technical things fixing various problems that had been introduced by previous amendments.
One of the key areas of change, and one which has provoked comment and controversy is the process of implementing the Bill. There has been much said about this that is a little less than accurate, including suggestions that the government has somehow refused to give a date for the ending of s21. That is not the case although it is true to say that the government scrubbed the original commencement provisions out of the Bill and replaced them with a more complex phased process.
The Bill must be passed and get its Royal Assent first. On that date the Bill comes into effect for the purpose of making regulations only. In other words none of its provisions will be effective. This is not terribly unusual and relatively few modern Bills come into effect on the day they get their Royal Assent, they are usually commenced later once all the structures needed to support them are in place. Indeed, this was exactly the process initially envisaged by the RRB when it was first published.
The government stated in the original Fairer Renting White Paper that it would give six months’ notice before getting rid of s21. They appear to be seeking to keep that promise and so they will presumably pass regulations giving a commencement date for the part of the RRB which amends the Housing Act 1988 to removes s21 and Assured Shorthold tenancies (ASTs) on some date six months into the future. At that first stage s21 and ASTs will cease to exist for all new tenancies. In fact, it is a little wider than this as the commencement provisions make clear that any tenancy which is created or renewed after that commencement date as well as any tenancy which moves from fixed term to periodic will cease to be an AST and will fall within the RRB. As most ASTs are for six or twelve months that means that the vast majority of existing tenancies would switch over during the following year, even if the government did nothing more.
The next phase is to move over any existing tenancy. Again the Fairer Renting White Paper gave a time commitment on this which was twelve months warning. However, the government has added a new hurdle which must be overcome before existing tenancies can be switched over. This new hurdle requires the Lord Chancellor to undertake “an assessment of the operation of the process by which … the county court is able to make orders for the possession of dwellings in England” as well as the process of enforcement. In other words the Lord Chancellor must assess the operation of residential possession proceedings and court bailiff enforcement of them. That assessment must be published. The complaint from tenant groups is that nothing in the provision requires the Lord Chancellor to do this on any specific timetable so it could be stalled indefinitely. But that is not really a justified complaint. As I have pointed out above for the entire period the Lord Chancellor is not assessing the process tenancies will be naturally converting as tenants turn over or fixed terms come to an end and so the number of tenancies will be dropping all the time. In addition, the assessment has to do no more than assess. It is not an assessment of effectiveness or efficiency and it does not have to reach any specific conclusion. The assessment could find that proceedings were hopelessly ineffective and the county court utterly inefficient (some might argue that it an accurate assessment right now!) and the government could theoretically carry on. In addition, the longer the delay the smaller the remaining number of tenancies and so the assessment is more likely to conclude (if it comes to any conclusion at all) that there will not be much difference made by going ahead and concerting the remaining tenancies. So the assessment is a bit of a double-edged sword and provides not massive benefit to landlords.
Once the assessment has been published then the government can pass regulations to bring remaining tenancies into the new regime, converting them from ASTs to assured tenancies.
So, it is not exactly true to say that the government has engineered an open-ended transition which will mean tenancies never convert. The dates are not ones that can be given now but we can see broadly when conversion will occur and the overwhelming majority of tenancies will convert over a time period. This is little different from the changes made by the Deregulation Act which also saw tenancies converting over a time period. Indeed there are still a small number of tenancies for which the provisions of the Deregulation Act do not apply. However, there seems little likelihood of a similar extended conversion process under the RRB."
So to cut a long story short, new tenancies will be secure without the need for court reform apparently.
Matthew Pennycook has said:
"It's now over five years since the Tories promised to scrap Section 21 no-fault evictions.
Private tenants will wait for years more if the government waters down its Renters Reform Bill today.
Labour will end Section 21 evictions immediately - no ifs, no buts."
So how does that fit in with the legislation? Certainly seems that the abolition of Section 21 will apply to existing tenancies immediately.
Can they actually do this if the Bill is already law? Is this a reason why we should be hoping the RRB goes through before any election, as that might give us more time to sort out our plans than if it is still hanging when (if ???) Labour win the election.
I suppose that Labour could bring in an eviction ban straight away as occurred during Covid and alter the regulations regarding the commencement dates etc with respect to existing and future tenancies. They could also bring in further legislation to amend the existing legislation.
They can ban what they like it’s a recipe for disaster, we will all sit on our hands and do nothing like all the advocators, that’s really good for the economy isn’t it.
We are serving a prison sentence without going to court and if we did it would be a ford gone conclusion and automatically stamped .
I thought the NRLA had already sabotage it themselves...
One thing is for sure, Nick, the NRLA was not stating that new tenancies would be secure tenancies irrespective of court reform.
Please login to comment