x
By using this website, you agree to our use of cookies to enhance your experience.

OTHER GUIDES & TIPS

Tax Cuts - what should we expect in Wednesday's Budget?

Like a parent whose kids expected half term in Disneyland, Jeremy Hunt is spending the week managing expectations – and crushing dreams. 

He doesn’t have as much space for tax cuts in the Budget as had been expected, so he faces some difficult choices. And like any parent set to endure a week-long staycation, he can expect widespread dissatisfaction.

It's worth bearing in mind that there’s an awful lot the Budget could achieve, even without significant tax cuts. 

Advertisement

Hunt could make a major difference to people’s long-term prospects with moves like tweaking the Lifetime ISA rules to enable people to open and pay in for longer, and withdraw cash without losing any of their own money.

He could boost investment by increasing the ISA limit, and offer details on plans for lifetime pensions. And he could help transform people’s financial resilience by offering a clear timetable for vital changes like the extension of auto-enrolment and clarity on the advice/guidance barrier. 

However, he needs to be careful not to announce changes that could introduce needless complexity – like a British ISA.

Income tax or NI cut - Initially the government had floated the idea of a 2p income tax cut. Given the cost involved, this is looking distinctly unlikely. Instead, Hunt could opt for a smaller 1p cut, and he might choose to cut National Insurance rather than income tax, on the grounds that it’s cheaper.

Inheritance tax cut - This particular kite has been flown more times than a Mary Poppins prop, with a cut to the main rate in the frame this time round. There’s every chance that this will be considered a cut too far at a time like this, especially given that it’s only paid by around 4% of estates. There’s also the risk it could reduce the incentive to give gifts across the generations during our lifetimes, so we may well see this shelved.

Income tax thresholds move - Unfreezing tax thresholds – including income tax – is a rank outsider, but it shouldn’t be forgotten that failing to increase these thresholds is an active choice, and one that is costing us a small fortune in income tax. One potential option, which could be cheaper, is a move to smooth the cliff edges, so you don’t suddenly have more tax to pay when you cross a threshold.

High income child benefit charge change - Depending on how far the £50,000 threshold moved, this could be a popular option without breaking the bank. At the moment, once one parent earns £50,100, they have to start paying child benefit back, and once they make £60,000 they need to return it all. It’s why the effective tax rate between these two figures is 60%. One in eight families are hit by this now, so a move in the threshold to reflect inflation in the interim could be popular.

Capital gains tax and dividend tax thresholds hold - The capital gains tax and dividend tax thresholds are set to be halved again in April, taking them to miserly levels (£3,000 and £500 respectively), and making it incredibly difficult for investors and entrepreneurs to plan tax-efficient income and gains outside an ISA or pension. It will make it even more essential to make as much use of your allowances as makes sense for your finances, to protect yourself from the relentless northward creep of both these taxes.

Stamp duty cut - Cutting stamp duty on property was always going to be tricky, because we’re in the middle of a stamp duty holiday at the moment. Making that holiday permanent wouldn’t make people feel any richer, so to have an impact Hunt would have to go further, which would be an expensive move when he has such little fiscal headroom to manoeuvre within.

Fuel duty cut - This is something of a hygiene factor. There won’t be much of a reaction if Hunt keeps the 5p fuel duty cut that was meant to be temporary, or if he freezes the fuel duty instead of hiking it as scheduled. However, if he doesn’t do either, it’s going to hit motorists hard, and leave a large number of voters out of pocket. The freeze wasn’t priced into the autumn statement maths – which raises the risk it will be ditched – however, there’s a chance Hunt left it out in the hope the maths would alter in his favour between then and now. He could find himself with little alternative than to keep duty where it is for now.

* Sarah Coles is head of personal finance at Hargreaves Lansdown * 

Want to comment on this story? If so...if any post is considered to victimise, harass, degrade or intimidate an individual or group of individuals on any basis, then the post may be deleted and the individual immediately banned from posting in future.

Join the conversation

  • icon

    I'd like to see the cliff edges addressed.
    Losing Child Benefit at the same time as starting to pay 40% tax is very, very painful and a complete disincentive to do any overtime.
    One of my sons has 5 children so will be paying 87% tax on a slice of his income. When you take into account the employers NI the government will be getting pretty much 100% of what he earns on the bit over £50K. He can't avoid working his contracted hours but he can turn down overtime.
    It needs to be remembered the take home pay on £50K is only £38771 (£745 a week), while on £60K it's £44603 (£857 a week). Take away the CB of £4555. Effectively he will be working for about £2.50 an hour if he does any overtime minus his extra travel to work costs. If he was only paying 40% tax and 2% NI he would max out his hours because that would genuinely benefit his families standard of living.

    Another son has a partner who only works 4 days a week due to wanting to keep below £50K. She would happily work 5 days but a combination of losing CB, extra childcare costs and tax means there's no real point in doing an extra day.

    Instead of trying to get untrained, poorly educated people into minimum wage jobs wouldn't it make more sense to incentivise people who are already employed, trained and productive to work to their potential. 40% tax should be ample to take off anyone. Taking the CB is just counterproductive greed.
    The same applies at £100K. Taking the personal allowance and access to childcare funding is counterproductive politics of envy.

    Obviously I'd like to see Section 24 abolished so landlords can expand portfolios to their hearts content without worrying about paying tax on interest payments.

    I'd also like to see indexation relief on CGT. Even if Capital Gains were taxed at our marginal rate after indexation relief was applied it would be far better than the blatant theft we experience now.

  • icon

    There won’t be anything in the budget to help the PRS as it is not a vote winner. They should really have the courage to do this and emphasise this will actually help the housing crisis.

  • icon

    I can’t see Hint doing much to help PRS either although everything they have done thus far has been designed to damage the Private Rented Sector, for example Licensing Schemes affecting rental costs of 11m Renters & 2.6m Landlords.
    Well that is if the Landlord is stupid enough to comply and a gold plated fool like me…..

  • icon

    Fools Comply with Licensing Schemes like me most redone 4 times at huge costs and on going, approx £150k wasted on those Schemes and that’s the tip of the iceberg.
    Quick check of the Register post codes where my properties are reveal which ones are Licensed not many apart from mine.
    I will give one as an example but synonymous with them all, 64 houses in this post code only 2 licensed and 3/4 times over mine. I’m not crowing about myself but all the houses are similar more or less and about 80% are let full,full,full some converted into flats & extended back & up.
    So Landlords shouldn’t worry they can’t fine them all. They’ll hit the odd one here and there with a big fine, I could pay a big fine with the money they have cost me, aren’t the Courts full already.
    The tip of the iceberg if they didn’t license their property did they declare their income and pay that lovely 40/45% tax or loose other Benefits that Jo is concerned about.

icon

Please login to comment

MovePal MovePal MovePal