x
By using this website, you agree to our use of cookies to enhance your experience.
Graham Awards

TODAY'S OTHER NEWS

Really? Think tank claims almost all landlords want stricter EPCs

Almost four fifths of landlords favour raising the Minimum Energy Efficiency Standards for private rental properties, a think tank claims.

The Social Market Foundation - which calls itself “a non-partisan think tank” - has conducted a survey which apparently shows that 79 per cent of landlords believe they should be subject to stricter energy efficiency regulations. Private sector landlords are in fact more supportive of raising the MEES to grade C than the general population, with only 11 per cent opposed to such a move.

This contradicts a very different result revealed in a survey last week by lender Landbay, which showed 74 per cent of private landlords welcoming the government’s decision to scrap the proposal that all rental property must have an energy performance certificate rating of at least C by 2028.

Advertisement

At present, the MEES is set to an E, which means that landlords are allowed to lease their properties if it gets an E rating on energy efficiency. The foundation claims this has led to the private rented sector being the worst performing tenure for energy efficiency in the UK.

The SMF claims private renters in England and Wales are on track to waste £1.1 billion (the equivalent of £220 per household) on energy that leaks out of their walls and windows.

In September, Prime Minister Rishi Sunak scrapped plans to require all landlords to upgrade their properties to at least EPC C by 2028, citing the need to protect tenants from unfair price hikes in rent due to the cost of renovations. 

The SMF says some landlords it has contacted expressed frustration at the uncertainty created by the government’s perceived indecisiveness and are worried that the goalposts might be moved once more. Others were upset at having spent substantial sums of money on improving their houses, only to discover that was unnecessary.

The foundation says economic incentives, such as making the costs of insulating a property are tax deductible from rental income, are a way to spur on landlords, but will be difficult to justify to the public, since only a quarter of people would support these incentives being available to all landlords. 

It suggests that a better approach would be to improve take-up of existing support – just over a fifth of landlords remain unaware of any such schemes. 

Other findings and recommendations from the research include both landlords and owner-occupiers sharing low trust in the insulation industry, and local authorities having a key role to play in increasing trust.

Niamh O Regan, researcher at Social Market Foundation, says: British homes are on a dismal trajectory when it comes to improving energy efficiency, and failing to improve the private rented sector is losing an easy win.

“Recent government actions seem to suggest that renters can either have energy efficient homes or affordable rents – but this is a false logic. Poor energy efficiency is currently costing them millions. Instead of trying to understand landlords and how they can be motivated  to better insulate their properties, the Government would rather kick the can down the road, pushing us further and further from greener, healthier and more net-zero friendly homes.”

You can read the full SMF report on this subject here.

Want to comment on this story? Our focus is on providing a platform for you to share your insights and views and we welcome contributions.
If any post is considered to victimise, harass, degrade or intimidate an individual or group of individuals, then the post may be deleted and the individual immediately banned from posting in future.
Please help us by reporting comments you consider to be unduly offensive so we can review and take action if necessary. Thank you.

  • Peter Lewis

    I suspect if the “Social Market Foundation” were to take other surveys they would find that 80% of Landlords would be in favour of halving rents, think that other landlords should be prevented from requiring deposits, there should be a twelve month rent holiday for all tenants, that landlords be held responsible for non paid Council Tax, and an automatic 50% discount be offered to existing tenants off the price of a property should the landlord wish to sell up.

  • icon

    This is either an early or a very late April fools joke 🤡. 😂🕺🏻

  • Fed Up Landlord

    Another left leaning disinformation campaign by the Socialist Wokerati Party.

  • icon

    Not this LL!

  • icon

    These think tanks are clueless

  • icon

    Ah well its nearly Christmas the turkeys are at it again.

  • Nic  Kaz

    I went to look at a reduced-price house with a view to BTL. Poor owners had spent their savings on spray foam loft insulation, thinking they were just doing what the government was promoting, then found to their horror that many mortgage companies wouldn’t lend to potential buyers on their home. A quick Google showed this can indeed be a big lending problem and I was appalled, not least because many of us landlords may have used EPC support schemes to do a similar thing as part of our upgrading. This should be a national scandal and is an example of why we have ‘low trust in the insulation industry’ (the only part of this article I agree with).

    icon

    This happened to a neighbour who was selling, just four doors from me. Price agreed, mortgage in place, survey came back as “Computer says NO”. Cost them thousands to get it removed.

     
    Nic  Kaz

    Sorry to hear that AL. One broker told me that even having it removed didn’t guarantee a mortgage as ‘damage may have already been done’ and many companies are so risk adverse they don’t make exceptions. This ‘Energy Performance Potential Penalty’ should be much more widely publicised, for the public as a whole!

     
    icon

    I read an article regarding a company that is split into 2 parts, those that spray lofts…..And another, not linked unless you really look 👀, who remove the same stuff 😂😂💰💰. Keerching 🫣🫣

     
    Nic  Kaz

    Wow Simon, that is outrageous!

     
  • Peter Why Do I Bother

    Social Media Think Tank ??? By definition of the statement non partisan means they are definitely partisan. Also a think tank that is not really thinking.

    Social Media means a few random angry entitled lefties posting how nasty their landlord is.

    Wasting 220 quid a year but want landlords to spend 15-20k ? Equates to 68 years before payback at the lower end. I have a better idea for these little soldiers.

    Pay your rent on time, everytime, keep the place tidy and at the end of the year I will give you 220 cashback for help with heating. This is from a Council Estate Idiot Think Tank.

  • icon

    The problem with Think tanks is that they don’t.

  • icon

    I didn’t realise it took a think tank to do a survey and if they just outsourced it they would have got the correct answer. What a bunch!

  • icon

    The Country must be in a terrible state if all the lame duck Organisations, Government's and everyone have nothing better do than attack Private Landlords.

  • icon

    Always good to start the day in stitches of laughter!!

    icon

    Agree 😂 recently there are more articles like this, they are fun though.

     
  • George Dawes

    In almost 30 years of letting shops and flats has a tenant ever once asked for an epc

    Solicitors etc obviously

icon

Please login to comment

MovePal MovePal MovePal
sign up