x
By using this website, you agree to our use of cookies to enhance your experience.
Graham Awards

TODAY'S OTHER NEWS

Empty property’s garden rubbish costs landlord thousands

A landlord has been landed with a bill of almost £2,800 for failing to clear rubbish and maintain his vacant property.

Alex Howard was found guilty by Liverpool Magistrates Court in relation to an empty property in Anfield which had been vacant for a number of years and previously used as a cannabis farm.

Complaints were received about the house which had domestic waste including a wardrobe dumped in the front garden, and a hole in the roof that was attracting vermin.

Advertisement

Council officers visited the site last April and subsequently served a notice on the owner requiring them to remove the rubbish and overgrown vegetation, secure the rear yard and carry out suitable pest control treatment.

A further notice was issued after a fire at the property led to pigeons gaining access to the roof space.

Howard failed to comply with either notice, so the council carried out the work itself and instigated court action.

He has been fined a total of £1,100 under the Prevention of Damage by Pest Act and Environment Protection Act, with the court making an additional surcharge of £308 and awarding costs of £1,365.10 to the council – meaning a total bill of £2,773.10.  

Sarah Doyle, the councillor responsible for housing, says: “Landlords have a responsibility to contribute positively to the communities and neighbourhoods their properties are in. Ensuring their properties are kept in decent condition to avoid attracting unwanted attention from pests and causing Anti-Social Behaviour is the minimum we expect and if management standards fall short, we will take the strongest action.

“The landlord’s lack of action was causing issues for a neighbouring property and he showed no interest in sorting it out when he was served with a notice, so we were left with no other option than to take court action but not after works were completed, extra charges incurred and a charge put onto the property.

“Everyone has the right to live in a clean neighbourhood and where we can take action, we will.”

Want to comment on this story? Our focus is on providing a platform for you to share your insights and views and we welcome contributions.
If any post is considered to victimise, harass, degrade or intimidate an individual or group of individuals, then the post may be deleted and the individual immediately banned from posting in future.
Please help us by reporting comments you consider to be unduly offensive so we can review and take action if necessary. Thank you.

  • icon

    Why ignore the notice ? wouldn't have taken a lot to clear the rubbish, spray the vegetation with a good strong mix of round up and patch the hole in the roof, a days work and the hire of a van or a skip to get rid of the rubbish, I suppose there are landlords who are frightened to get their hands dirty ?

  • George Dawes

    Imagine if he'd burned all that dope , the whole street would've been high as a kite

  • icon

    It must be another fed up landlord with so many stupid regulation’s it’s probably not worth his while doing anything with it. Better of paid the fine and the Council always pay themselves too much.
    Very sad really it’s in a central location enough, the money would be far better spent on the property, then again if he has suffered a cannabis farm it’s recked anyway and no good throwing money at it.
    To sell the house probably £50k and of done up it would cost you another 50k + with all the new regulation’s and requirements but you wouldn’t get £100k for this little Terraced, so it’s not viable. I don’t know how much rubbish could be in the front garden there nearly out on the Road.
    The Council charged enough but the property still not back in use. I know the area well enough passed my test near by in Kirkdale 60 years ago.

  • icon

    Basically this a case of blaming the victim. People seem to be able to break into properties grow cannabis and their is no retribution or compensation. Invariably the police do not take any action apart from confiscating the plants.

    icon

    It is true that the Police take little or no action, I found a small (10 plants) farm in a commercial property a few yrs ago, the police turned up in a police van and took the plants away, I thought we were going to catch the scum, if there's a next time I won't report it, I'll sit there in wait with a 12 bore

     
  • Bill Wood

    If the property is empty, should the owner be described as a landlord?
    If there is no tenant, then there is no landlord.

    icon

    Good point, property owner.

     
icon

Please login to comment

MovePal MovePal MovePal
sign up