x
By using this website, you agree to our use of cookies to enhance your experience.
Graham Awards

TODAY'S OTHER NEWS

Fine of £40,000 for landlord who put tenants at risk

A landlord and his property company have been ordered to pay a total of £40,000 in fines after a council says he put tenants at risk.

Breckland council in East Anglia has taken enforcement action after an improvement notice was issued on a property last year.

It had a blocked fire escape, damaged fire doors, dangerous electrics and broken and rotten windows, causing the council to deem the property unsafe.

Advertisement

The landlord of the property, an HMO, was given time to carry out repairs. However, a follow-up inspection found insufficient progress had been made and, as a result, the council issued a £20,000 fine to the landlord company and £20,000 to the property company's director.

The fines have now been paid and will be used to fund further investigations in the district. Work to address the issues in the property has since been completed by the landlord.

A spokesperson for the council says: "The vast majority of Breckland's landlords provide well-maintained homes for their tenants and the quality of housing overall is very good. However, this case shows that the council will not tolerate a decline in housing quality or for residents to be put at risk and we will take action to protect our residents' right to live in a safe home."

Want to comment on this story? Our focus is on providing a platform for you to share your insights and views and we welcome contributions.
If any post is considered to victimise, harass, degrade or intimidate an individual or group of individuals, then the post may be deleted and the individual immediately banned from posting in future.
Please help us by reporting comments you consider to be unduly offensive so we can review and take action if necessary. Thank you.

  • icon

    Who blocked the fire exit, and damaged the fire doors tenants maybe?

  • icon

    That’s one down side of having a Company you go fined twice, the landlord was very naughty he shouldn’t be blocking fire escapes / damaging fire doors or his electric’s.

    icon

    If I were a tenant, I would deal with hazards like a blocked fire escape, mould etc. I wouldn't damage electrical fittings but I would make them safe to keep my family safe.

    Andrew is right. The tenants probably caused the problems.

     
  • Clare Dundas

    My house was wrecked by a Romanian gang. Up to 17 people trafficked illegally to the uk and living there, mattresses on floors, wires pulled out of the ceiling roses, cockroach infestation that took over a month to eliminate. The filth, the stink, the squalor. It cost me over £6k to put everything right, recarpet, redecorate, etc. Hull city council had received complaints from neighbours over a two year period and only finally alerted me last year. I'd been receiving the rent on time each month, so assumed the nice Romanian women whom I had let the house to, along with her two children, were good tenants and doing fine. After the first few months I stopped checking the property, wrongly assuming all was ok. My fault entirely. Hull city council wanted me to allow the tenant and her children (clearly a front for the gang) to return to the property once all was again in order, as they had 'the right.' I declined to go along with this ludicrous order and the neighbours said they would barricade the street should the 'tenant' be permitted to return. £6k later and my property was let to a young mum and all was good again until the same environmental enforcement officer, the Witch Finder General from HCC , did an inspection of the property a few months ago. The list of demands she sent me were mostly preposterous. In a kitchen the size of a postage stamp I was ordered to put a radiator, even though the tenant did not want or need it. A couple of electrical sockets had to be placed an inch or so higher than they were, a dripping garden tap had to be fixed, the roof to the lean to had to be recovered even though it wasnt leaking, and the gutters had to be cleared, and one electrical socket that had no power had to have power, despite there being ample more. Oh, and two doors onto the hallway had to be made of solid wood. Funny how friends of mine in council housing don't have these, but there we go. There is a housing shortage; a crisis. Mortgage rate increases are zeroing out any / all profits from residential lettings. If councils are not reasonable, many properties will become serviced rentals on online travel agency sites, achieving the same monthly income but every week and without the hassle! Guest reviews on these sites will ensure that properties are maintained. It's a no brainer. The housing crisis will get much worse once landlords decide to go this way, fed up to the back teeth of unreasonable demands from council irritants who will support and defend bad tenants to the hilt. In the case in question, the original post, the landlord and property company do seem to be at fault but, from my own ongoing experience, there are two sides to the story.

    Peter Why Do I Bother

    I feel your pain, elsewhere on here you can see my own dramas recently.

    Preston council want me to completely renovate a property with the little swines who wrecked it.! Madness

     
  • icon

    Watton a market town 10 miles from me is not an area to own properties, I don't know this property or the landlord, there is a large pork prosessing factory there that employs east europeans, so these were likely the tenants here, as others have said 2 sides to these stories

icon

Please login to comment

MovePal MovePal MovePal
sign up